Literature DB >> 36210402

Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy.

Minke L Feenstra1,2,3, Lily Alkemade1, Janneke E van den Bergh4, Suzanne S Gisbertz1,2,3, Freek Daams2,3,5, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen1,2,3, Wietse J Eshuis6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3-4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36210402     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of Routine Esophagram for Detecting Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kelly R Haisley; Missy L DeSouza; Elizabeth N Dewey; Sabrina E Drexel; Yalini Vigneswaran; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  Feasibility of complete nasogastric tube omission in esophagectomy patients.

Authors:  Rusi Zhang; Lanjun Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Analysis of the Effect of Early Versus Conventional Nasogastric Tube Removal on Postoperative Complications After Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yoshiaki Shoji; Syuhei Mayanagi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Risk Factors and Consequences of Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Maud A Reijntjes; Martinus C J Anderegg; Wietse J Eshuis; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

Authors:  M B Tirnaksiz; C Deschamps; M S Allen; D C Johnson; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  An evaluation of the routine use of contrast radiography as a screening test for cervical anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Daniel G Solomon; Clarence T Sasaki; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhongwu Hu; Xiaowe Wang; Xush An; Wenjin Li; Yun Feng; Zhenbing You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Moniek H P Verstegen; Bastiaan R Klarenbeek; Stefan A W Bouwense; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Freek Daams; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Gerjon Hannink; Jan Willem Haveman; Joos Heisterkamp; Walther Jansen; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Jan J B van Lanschot; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Donald L van der Peet; Fatih Polat; Sander Ubels; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Maroeska M Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.