Literature DB >> 18843033

Multianalyte profiling of serum antigens and autoimmune and infectious disease molecules to identify biomarkers dysregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Greg P Bertenshaw1, Ping Yip, Partha Seshaiah, Jinghua Zhao, Tzong-Hao Chen, Wesley S Wiggins, James P Mapes, Brian C Mansfield.   

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the United States. When detected early, the 5-year survival rate is 92%, although most cases remain undetected until the late stages where 5-year survival rates are 30%. Serum biomarkers may hold promise. Although many markers have been proposed and multivariate diagnostic models were built to fit the data on small, disparate sample sets, there has been no systematic evaluation of these markers on a single, large, well-defined sample set. To address this, we evaluated the dysregulation of 204 molecules in a sample set consisting of serum from 294 patients, collected from multiple collection sites, under a well-defined Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol. The population, weighted with early-stage cancers to assess biomarker value for early detection, contained all stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecologic conditions. The panel of serum molecules was assayed using rigorously qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and evaluated for their independent ovarian cancer diagnostic potential. Seventy-seven biomarkers were dysregulated in the ovarian cancer samples, although cancer antigen 125, C-reactive protein, epidermal growth factor receptor, interleukin 10, interleukin 8, connective tissue growth factor, haptoglobin, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 stood out as the most informative. When analyzed by cancer subtype and stage, there were differences in the relative value of biomarkers. In this study, using a large sample cohort, we show that some of the reported ovarian cancer biomarkers are more robust than others, and we identify additional informative candidates. These findings may guide the development of multivariate diagnostic models, which should be tested on additional, prospectively collected samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18843033     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  36 in total

Review 1.  Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Authors:  Brian M Nolen; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Serum biomarker panels for the discrimination of benign from malignant cases in patients with an adnexal mass.

Authors:  Brian Nolen; Liudmila Velikokhatnaya; Adele Marrangoni; Koen De Geest; Aleksey Lomakin; Robert C Bast; Anna Lokshin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Molecular signatures of ovarian cancer: from detection to prognosis.

Authors:  Christine S Walsh; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Identification of targeted analyte clusters for studies of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tammy M K Cheng; Yu-En Lu; Paul C Guest; Hassan Rahmoune; Laura W Harris; Lan Wang; Dan Ma; Victoria Stelzhammer; Yagnesh Umrania; Matt T Wayland; Pietro Lió; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Validation of a blood-based laboratory test to aid in the confirmation of a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emanuel Schwarz; Rauf Izmailov; Michael Spain; Anthony Barnes; James P Mapes; Paul C Guest; Hassan Rahmoune; Sandra Pietsch; F Markus Leweke; Matthias Rothermundt; Johann Steiner; Dagmar Koethe; Laura Kranaster; Patricia Ohrmann; Thomas Suslow; Yishai Levin; Bernhard Bogerts; Nico Jm van Beveren; George McAllister; Natalya Weber; David Niebuhr; David Cowan; Robert H Yolken; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-05-12

6.  Quantitative proteomic analysis by iTRAQ(R) for the identification of candidate biomarkers in ovarian cancer serum.

Authors:  Kristin Lm Boylan; John D Andersen; Lorraine B Anderson; LeeAnn Higgins; Amy Pn Skubitz
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tracey Edgell; G Martin-Roussety; G Barker; D J Autelitano; D Allen; P Grant; G E Rice
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Heterosubtypic anti-avian H5N1 influenza antibodies in intravenous immunoglobulins from globally separate populations protect against H5N1 infection in cell culture.

Authors:  John S Sullivan; Paul W Selleck; Teena Downton; Ingrid Boehm; Anna-Maree Axell; Yasmin Ayob; Natalie M Kapitza; Wayne Dyer; Anna Fitzgerald; Bradley Walsh; Garry W Lynch
Journal:  J Mol Genet Med       Date:  2009-12-23

10.  Identification of a biomarker panel using a multiplex proximity ligation assay improves accuracy of pancreatic cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Stephanie T Chang; Jacob M Zahn; Joe Horecka; Pamela L Kunz; James M Ford; George A Fisher; Quynh T Le; Daniel T Chang; Hanlee Ji; Albert C Koong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.