Literature DB >> 20121286

Molecular signatures of ovarian cancer: from detection to prognosis.

Christine S Walsh1, Beth Y Karlan.   

Abstract

The search for an effective screening test for the early detection of ovarian cancer has been intensive. Transvaginal ultrasound and the serum biomarker cancer antigen 125 (CA125) have been used clinically for decades in high-risk populations despite the lack of evidence demonstrating efficacy. More recently, new technologies have identified novel biomarker panels that attempt to improve on the performance of currently available modalities. Some of these tests report superior performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value) when compared with CA125 testing alone. Based on early encouraging studies, two commercial ovarian cancer screening products were recently marketed to the public and medical community. They were both withdrawn after concerns were raised by the US FDA and the scientific community regarding their validation and efficacy. There is no clear and established pipeline for the development and approval of these types of tests, and the FDA is working to fill in a large regulatory gap. In order to minimize the potential for public harm, an ovarian cancer screening test will need to be appropriately tested before being made available to the general population. In this review, we discuss the current state of biomarker development for the early detection of ovarian cancer and explore the continuing challenges to realizing this goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121286     DOI: 10.1007/bf03256349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  62 in total

1.  Point: Proteomic patterns in biological fluids: do they represent the future of cancer diagnostics?

Authors:  Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  High-resolution serum proteomic features for ovarian cancer detection.

Authors:  T P Conrads; V A Fusaro; S Ross; D Johann; V Rajapakse; B A Hitt; S M Steinberg; E C Kohn; D A Fishman; G Whitely; J C Barrett; L A Liotta; E F Petricoin; T D Veenstra
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 3.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Proteins with whey-acidic-protein motifs and cancer.

Authors:  Dominique Bouchard; Dany Morisset; Yves Bourbonnais; Guy M Tremblay
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Identification by cDNA microarray of genes involved in ovarian carcinogenesis.

Authors:  K Ono; T Tanaka; T Tsunoda; O Kitahara; C Kihara; A Okamoto; K Ochiai; T Takagi; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; D Scott McMeekin; Amy K Brown; Paul DiSilvestro; M Craig Miller; W Jeffrey Allard; Walter Gajewski; Robert Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence.

Authors:  Laura J Havrilesky; Clark M Whitehead; Jennifer M Rubatt; Robert L Cheek; John Groelke; Qin He; Douglas P Malinowski; Timothy J Fischer; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Toward an optimal algorithm for ovarian cancer screening with longitudinal tumor markers.

Authors:  S J Skates; F J Xu; Y H Yu; K Sjövall; N Einhorn; Y Chang; R C Bast; R C Knapp
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ian J Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to breast and ovarian cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jim Klostergaard; Kenia Parga; Raphael G Raptis
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

Review 2.  TWIST and ovarian cancer stem cells: implications for chemoresistance and metastasis.

Authors:  Sudhakar V Nuti; Gil Mor; Peiyao Li; Gang Yin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.