Literature DB >> 22149035

Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Brian M Nolen1, Anna E Lokshin.   

Abstract

The goal of effective population-based screening for ovarian cancer remains elusive despite intense efforts aimed at improving upon biomarker and imaging modalities. While dozens of potential serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer have been identified in recent years, none have yet overcome the limitations that have hindered the clinical use of CA-125. Avenues of opportunity in biomarker development are emerging as investigators are beginning to appreciate the significance of remote, as well as local or regional, sources of biomarkers in the construction of diagnostic panels, as well as the importance of evaluating biomarkers in prediagnostic settings. As the list of candidate biomarkers of ovarian cancer continues to grow, refinements in the methods through which specific proteins are selected for further development as components of diagnostic panels are desperately sought. Such refinements must take into account both the bioinformatic and biological significance of each candidate. Approaches incorporating these considerations may potentially overcome the challenges to early detection posed by the histological heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. Here, we review the recent progress achieved in efforts to develop diagnostic biomarker panels for ovarian cancer and discuss the challenges that remain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22149035      PMCID: PMC3312922          DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  143 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Quantifying the potential benefit of CA 125 screening for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S J Skates; D E Singer
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status.

Authors:  J K Gohagan; P C Prorok; R B Hayes; B S Kramer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

Review 4.  Precursors to pelvic serous carcinoma and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Ann K Folkins; Elke A Jarboe; Michael H Roh; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence.

Authors:  Laura J Havrilesky; Clark M Whitehead; Jennifer M Rubatt; Robert L Cheek; John Groelke; Qin He; Douglas P Malinowski; Timothy J Fischer; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Regulation of cytokine receptors by Golgi N-glycan processing and endocytosis.

Authors:  Emily A Partridge; Christine Le Roy; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Judy Pawling; Pam Cheung; Maria Granovsky; Ivan R Nabi; Jeffrey L Wrana; James W Dennis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The relationship of insulin-like growth factor-II, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, and estrogen receptor-alpha expression to disease progression in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lingeng Lu; Dionyssios Katsaros; Andrew Wiley; Irene A Rigault de la Longrais; Harvey A Risch; Manuela Puopolo; Herbert Yu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  CA 125: the past and the future.

Authors:  R C Bast; F J Xu; Y H Yu; S Barnhill; Z Zhang; G B Mills
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

Review 10.  Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy.

Authors:  K J O'Byrne; A G Dalgleish
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

1.  NFAT Overexpression Correlates with CA72-4 and Poor Prognosis of Ovarian Clear-Cell Carcinoma Subtype.

Authors:  Bing Xin; Kai-Qiang Ji; Yi-Si Liu; Xiao-Dong Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Ascites analysis by a microfluidic chip allows tumor-cell profiling.

Authors:  Vanessa M Peterson; Cesar M Castro; Jaehoon Chung; Nathan C Miller; Adeeti V Ullal; Maria D Castano; Richard T Penson; Hakho Lee; Michael J Birrer; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gynaecologic cancer symptom awareness, concern and care seeking among US women: a multi-site qualitative study.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Lindsey Polonec; Sherri L Stewart; Cynthia A Gelb
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 4.  In 2014, can we do better than CA125 in the early detection of ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Joshua G Cohen; Matthew White; Ana Cruz; Robin Farias-Eisner
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-26

5.  Novel protein and immune response markers of human serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  Dmitriy W Gutkin; Michael R Shurin; Mounia Alaoui El Azher; Galina V Shurin; Liudmila Velikokhatnaya; Denise Prosser; Namhee Shin; Francesmary Modugno; Paul Stemmer; Esther Elishaev; Anna Lokshin
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 6.  Ovarian cancer: in search of better marker systems based on DNA repair defects.

Authors:  Dominic Varga; Miriam Deniz; Lukas Schwentner; Lisa Wiesmüller
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A longitudinal analysis with CA-125 to predict overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  An Jen Chiang; Jiabin Chen; Yu-Che Chung; Huan-Jung Huang; Wen Shiung Liou; Chung Chang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  CD146 is a potential marker for the diagnosis of malignancy in cervical and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Haofeng Zhang; Jun Zhang; Zhaoqing Wang; DI Lu; Jing Feng; Dongling Yang; Xiuqin Chen; Xiyun Yan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Diagnosis and preoperative predictive value of serum HE4 concentrations for optimal debulking in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Zhijun Yang; Zhaoqin Luo; Bingbing Zhao; Wei Zhang; Jieqing Zhang; Zhuang Li; Li Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Proteomic identification of fucosylated haptoglobin alpha isoforms in ascitic fluids and its localization in ovarian carcinoma tissues from Mexican patients.

Authors:  Olga Lilia Garibay-Cerdenares; Verónica Ivonne Hernández-Ramírez; Juan Carlos Osorio-Trujillo; Magdalena Hernández-Ortíz; Dolores Gallardo-Rincón; David Cantú de León; Sergio Encarnación-Guevara; Julio César Villegas-Pineda; Patricia Talamás-Rohana
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.