Kate Cuschieri1, Nicolas Wentzensen. 1. Specialist Virology Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Kate.Cuschieri@luht.scot.nhs.uk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the genital tract is very common and normally follows a benign clinical course; however, in an unfortunate minority of infected individuals, it can cause disease that sometimes leads to cancer. It is accepted that HPV DNA testing has a role in the management of cervical disease both in a prevaccination and postvaccination era; however, to improve the specificity of this approach, there is a requirement to develop and validate tools/assays that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. There is evidence to suggest that detection of viral gene expression both directly and indirectly may constitute a more specific approach for delineating clinically significant infection compared with HPV DNA-based assays. HPV oncogene expression and evidence of its deregulation can be monitored through direct detection of viral mRNA transcripts or through detection of the cellular protein p16. For both approaches, commercial assays have been introduced and numerous studies have been conducted. The present article describes the scientific theory underpinning these approaches, their amenability to routine-diagnostic specimens/settings, and the clinical data that has been garnered through their application thus far. Currently, there is promising data indicating that HPV mRNA and p16 might play an important role in future cervical cancer screening scenarios. Still, large randomized studies are necessary to confirm the preliminary data. METHODS: PubMed and OVID were interrogated with search terms "HPV RNA;" "HPV mRNA;" "HPV transcript-detection, testing, and methods;" "p16" AND "cervical cancer;" "p16" AND "CIN;" "p16" AND "histology"; "p16" AND "cytology;" "p16;" and "screening."
UNLABELLED: Humanpapillomavirus (HPV) infection of the genital tract is very common and normally follows a benign clinical course; however, in an unfortunate minority of infected individuals, it can cause disease that sometimes leads to cancer. It is accepted that HPV DNA testing has a role in the management of cervical disease both in a prevaccination and postvaccination era; however, to improve the specificity of this approach, there is a requirement to develop and validate tools/assays that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. There is evidence to suggest that detection of viral gene expression both directly and indirectly may constitute a more specific approach for delineating clinically significant infection compared with HPV DNA-based assays. HPV oncogene expression and evidence of its deregulation can be monitored through direct detection of viral mRNA transcripts or through detection of the cellular protein p16. For both approaches, commercial assays have been introduced and numerous studies have been conducted. The present article describes the scientific theory underpinning these approaches, their amenability to routine-diagnostic specimens/settings, and the clinical data that has been garnered through their application thus far. Currently, there is promising data indicating that HPV mRNA and p16 might play an important role in future cervical cancer screening scenarios. Still, large randomized studies are necessary to confirm the preliminary data. METHODS: PubMed and OVID were interrogated with search terms "HPV RNA;" "HPV mRNA;" "HPV transcript-detection, testing, and methods;" "p16" AND "cervical cancer;" "p16" AND "CIN;" "p16" AND "histology"; "p16" AND "cytology;" "p16;" and "screening."
Authors: Qi Zhang; Louise Kuhn; Lynette A Denny; Michelle De Souza; Sylvia Taylor; Thomas C Wright Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Monika Hampl; Matthias Herkert; Anja Reichert; Marcus J Trunk; Christopher Poremba; Ruediger Ridder; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Christine Bergeron; Frederic Cas; Svetlana Vinokurova; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Philip E Castle; Janel Dockter; Cristina Giachetti; Francisco A R Garcia; Mary Kay McCormick; Amy L Mitchell; E Blair Holladay; Daniel P Kolk Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gustavo R A Focchi; Ismael D C G Silva; Naiara C Nogueira-de-Souza; Cristine Dobo; Celina T Oshima; João N Stavale Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: N W J Bulkmans; J Berkhof; S Bulk; M C G Bleeker; F J van Kemenade; L Rozendaal; P J F Snijders; C J L M Meijer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; William C Hunt; Nancy Joste; Arpita Ghosh; Nicolas Wentzensen; Cosette M Wheeler Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Yuxin Liu; W Glenn McCluggage; Teresa M Darragh; Wenxin Zheng; Jennifer M Roberts; Kay J Park; Pei Hui; Morgan Blakely; Keith Sigel; Michael M Gaisa Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Philip E Castle; Stephen Follansbee; Sylvia Borgonovo; Diane Tokugawa; Lauren M Schwartz; Thomas S Lorey; Brandon LaMere; Julia C Gage; Barbara Fetterman; Teresa M Darragh; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 4.254