Literature DB >> 17294450

Evaluation of a new p16(INK4A) ELISA test and a high-risk HPV DNA test for cervical cancer screening: results from proof-of-concept study.

Constance Mao1, Akhila Balasubramanian, Mujun Yu, Nancy Kiviat, Ruediger Ridder, Anja Reichert, Matthias Herkert, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Laura A Koutsky.   

Abstract

p16(INK4a), a cell cycle regulation protein, accumulates in abnormal epithelial cells infected with high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV). In immunostaining studies, p16(INK4a) has shown potential as a marker of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. To evaluate its potential use in cervical cancer screening, we conducted a feasibility study to compare the performance of a new enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for p16(INK4a) (mtm laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) to that of the Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) test for high-risk HPV DNA for the detection of CIN3. Three hundred and nineteen women were referred from Western Washington Planned Parenthood clinics for colposcopy examination and cervical biopsy because of abnormal Pap test results. Cervical samples were obtained from study participants for p16(INK4a) ELISA, liquid-based cytology and hc2. The order (first and second) for obtaining samples for cervical cytology and p16(INK4a) ELISA changed with every other subject. Concentrations of p16(INK4a) protein were higher when the sample was taken before the cytology. The sensitivity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (concentration > or = 8 units/ml) taken as first sample was 90.0% for CIN3, and the sensitivity of HC2 taken as a second sample was 85%. In the same group, the specificity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (46.9%) was slightly better than hc2 (35.4%) Results from this proof-of-concept study suggest that p16(INK4a) ELISA has a similar sensitivity and slightly better specificity for CIN3 compared to hc2. These findings support proceeding with a larger study with samples from a population of women presenting for routine cytology screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294450     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  10 in total

1.  A unified sample preparation protocol for proteomic and genomic profiling of cervical swabs to identify biomarkers for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Janet S Rader; James P Malone; Julia Gross; Petra Gilmore; Rebecca A Brooks; Loan Nguyen; Dan L Crimmins; Sheng Feng; Jason D Wright; Nicholas Taylor; Israel Zighelboim; Margo C Funk; Phyllis C Huettner; Jack H Ladenson; David Gius; R Reid Townsend
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy.

Authors:  Patti E Gravitt; Jerome L Belinson; Jorge Salmeron; Keerti V Shah
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus mRNA and p16 detection as biomarkers for the improved diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Kate Cuschieri; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Early detection of cervical carcinomas: finding an overall approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and carcinoma of the anus].

Authors:  M von Knebel Doeberitz; M Reuschenbach
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Identification and validation of genes involved in cervical tumourigenesis.

Authors:  Thangarajan Rajkumar; Kesavan Sabitha; Neelakantan Vijayalakshmi; Sundersingh Shirley; Mayil Vahanan Bose; Gopisetty Gopal; Ganesharaja Selvaluxmy
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Histone H3 Acetyl K9 and Histone H3 Tri Methyl K4 as Prognostic Markers for Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Susanne Beyer; Junyan Zhu; Doris Mayr; Christina Kuhn; Sandra Schulze; Simone Hofmann; Christian Dannecker; Udo Jeschke; Bernd P Kost
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  The involvement of E6, p53, p16, MDM2 and Gal-3 in the clinical outcome of patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Annika Stiasny; Christoph P Freier; Christina Kuhn; Sandra Schulze; Doris Mayr; Christoph Alexiou; Christina Janko; Irmi Wiest; Christian Dannecker; Udo Jeschke; Bernd P Kost
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Guidelines of the Italian Society for Virology on HPV testing and vaccination for cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Luisa Barzon; Colomba Giorgi; Franco M Buonaguro; Giorgio Palù
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.965

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.