Literature DB >> 18842073

Audiovisual events capture attention: evidence from temporal order judgments.

Erik Van der Burg1, Christian N L Olivers, Adelbert W Bronkhorst, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

Is an irrelevant audiovisual event able to guide attention automatically? In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked to make a temporal order judgment (TOJ) about which of two dots (left or right) appeared first. In Experiment 3, participants were asked to make a simultaneity judgment (SJ) instead. Such tasks have been shown to be affected by attention. Lateral to each of the dots, nine irrelevant distractors continuously changed color. Prior to the presentation of the first dot, a spatially non-informative tone was synchronized with the color change of one of these distractors, either on the same side or on the opposite side of the first dot. Even though both the tone and the distractors were completely irrelevant to the task, TOJs were affected by the synchronized distractor. TOJs were not affected when the tone was absent or synchronized with distractors on both sides. SJs were also affected by the synchronized distractor, ruling out an alternative response bias hypothesis. We conclude that audiovisual synchrony guides attention in an exogenous manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842073     DOI: 10.1167/8.5.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  21 in total

1.  Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory facilitation of visual-target detection persists regardless of retinal eccentricity and despite wide audiovisual misalignments.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Searching for audiovisual correspondence in multiple speaker scenarios.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Patrick T Goodbourn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06

9.  Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.