Literature DB >> 1884184

New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man.

P Brown1, J C Rothwell, P D Thompson, T C Britton, B L Day, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

The latency and pattern of muscle recruitment in the startle response elicited by unexpected auditory stimulation was determined in 12 healthy subjects. Reflex EMG activity was recorded first in orbicularis oculi. This was of similar latency to the normal auditory blink reflex and, unlike the generalized startle response, persisted despite the frequent presentation of the test stimulus. It is argued that this early latency activity in orbicularis oculi represents a normal auditory blink reflex and is not part of the generalized auditory startle reflex. With the exception of this early latency activity in orbicularis oculi, the relative latencies of both cranial and distal muscles in the auditory startle response increased with the distance of their respective segmental innervations from the caudal brainstem. Thus the earliest EMG activity was recorded in sternocleidomastoid. The recruitment of caudal muscles was relatively slow and the latencies of the intrinsic hand muscles were disproportionately long. The pattern of recruitment of cranial muscles suggests a brainstem origin for the normal startle response. Studies on the auditory startle reflex in animals are reviewed in the light of this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1884184     DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.4.1891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  91 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Early activation of arm and leg muscles following pulls to the waist during walking.

Authors:  John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of combined cortical and acoustic stimuli on muscle activity.

Authors:  R J Fisher; A Sharott; A A Kühn; P Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Quincy J Almeida; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  A startle speeds up the execution of externally guided saccades.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Hatice Kumru; Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Chris J Dakin; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of levetiracetam in startle disease.

Authors:  Gerhard J Luef; Wolfgang N Löscher
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Startle responses elicited by whiplash perturbations.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Blouin; J Timothy Inglis; Gunter P Siegmund
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Pattern of startle reflex to somatosensory stimuli changes after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yasin Abanoz; Yeşim Abanoz; Ayşegül Gündüz; Murat Uludağ; Nurettin İrem Örnek; Nurten Uzun; Halil Ünalan; Meral Kızıltan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.