Literature DB >> 12974570

Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects.

Ran Tao1, Martin J M Lankheet, Wim A van de Grind, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

It is well established that motion aftereffects (MAEs) can show interocular transfer (IOT); that is, motion adaptation in one eye can give a MAE in the other eye. Different quantification methods and different test stimuli have been shown to give different IOT magnitudes, varying from no to almost full IOT. In this study, we examine to what extent IOT of the dynamic MAE (dMAE), that is the MAE seen with a dynamic noise test pattern, varies with velocity of the adaptation stimulus. We measured strength of dMAE by a nulling method. The aftereffect induced by adaptation to a moving random-pixel array was compensated (nulled), during a brief dynamic test period, by the same kind of motion stimulus of variable luminance signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR). The LSNR nulling value was determined in a Quest-staircase procedure. We found that velocity has a strong effect on the magnitude of IOT for the dMAE. For increasing speeds from 1.5 deg s(-1) to 24 deg s(-1) average IOT values increased about linearly from 18% to 63% or from 32% to 83%, depending on IOT definition. The finding that dMAEs transfer to an increasing extent as speed increases, suggests that binocular cells play a more dominant role at higher speeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12974570     DOI: 10.1068/p3442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  4 in total

1.  The surface and deep structure of the waterfall illusion.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wade; Martina Ziefle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

2.  Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Kyle Guillet; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Intramanual and intermanual transfer of the curvature aftereffect.

Authors:  Bernard J van der Horst; Maarten J A Duijndam; Myrna F M Ketels; Martine T J M Wilbers; Sandra A Zwijsen; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Habituation of visual adaptation.

Authors:  Xue Dong; Yi Gao; Lili Lv; Min Bao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.