PURPOSE: To prospectively test the hypothesis that iron labeling of radioembolization microspheres permits their visualization by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for in vivo tracking during transcatheter delivery to liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Phantom studies were performed to quantify microsphere relaxivity and volume susceptibility properties and compare image contrast patterns resulting from aggregate deposition of unlabeled and iron-labeled microspheres. In seven rabbits in which nine VX2 liver tumors were implanted, T2*-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) MR images with negative image contrast (NC), white-marker (WM) GRE images with positive image contrast (PC), and on-resonance water-suppression turbo spin-echo (SE) images with PC were obtained before and after catheter-directed administration of microspheres into the hepatic artery. During each injection, serial GRE acquisitions were performed for real-time visualization of microsphere delivery. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured between regions of microsphere accumulation and regions of normal liver parenchyma that demonstrated no apparent microsphere accumulation. Pre- and postinjection CNR measurements at identical spatial positions were compared by using paired t test (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Conventional microspheres did not produce detectable image contrast in phantoms. Iron-labeled microspheres produced susceptibility-induced dipole patterns with spatial extent of image contrast increasing with increasing microsphere dose. Real-time image series depicted both preferential delivery to tumor tissues and nontargeted delivery to adjacent organs. T2*-weighted GRE, WM GRE, and on-resonance water-suppression turbo SE each permitted in vivo visualization of the microsphere deposition, with postinjection CNR values (mean, 14.29 +/- 3.98 [standard deviation], 1.87 +/- 0.93, and 19.30 +/- 8.72, respectively) significantly greater than corresponding preinjection CNR values (mean, 2.02 +/- 4.65, 0.02 +/- 0.27, 0.85 +/- 2.65, respectively) (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Microsphere tracking during radioembolization may permit real-time verification of delivery and detection of extrahepatic shunting. RSNA, 2008
PURPOSE: To prospectively test the hypothesis that iron labeling of radioembolization microspheres permits their visualization by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for in vivo tracking during transcatheter delivery to liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Phantom studies were performed to quantify microsphere relaxivity and volume susceptibility properties and compare image contrast patterns resulting from aggregate deposition of unlabeled and iron-labeled microspheres. In seven rabbits in which nine VX2 liver tumors were implanted, T2*-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) MR images with negative image contrast (NC), white-marker (WM) GRE images with positive image contrast (PC), and on-resonance water-suppression turbo spin-echo (SE) images with PC were obtained before and after catheter-directed administration of microspheres into the hepatic artery. During each injection, serial GRE acquisitions were performed for real-time visualization of microsphere delivery. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured between regions of microsphere accumulation and regions of normal liver parenchyma that demonstrated no apparent microsphere accumulation. Pre- and postinjection CNR measurements at identical spatial positions were compared by using paired t test (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Conventional microspheres did not produce detectable image contrast in phantoms. Iron-labeled microspheres produced susceptibility-induced dipole patterns with spatial extent of image contrast increasing with increasing microsphere dose. Real-time image series depicted both preferential delivery to tumor tissues and nontargeted delivery to adjacent organs. T2*-weighted GRE, WM GRE, and on-resonance water-suppression turbo SE each permitted in vivo visualization of the microsphere deposition, with postinjection CNR values (mean, 14.29 +/- 3.98 [standard deviation], 1.87 +/- 0.93, and 19.30 +/- 8.72, respectively) significantly greater than corresponding preinjection CNR values (mean, 2.02 +/- 4.65, 0.02 +/- 0.27, 0.85 +/- 2.65, respectively) (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Microsphere tracking during radioembolization may permit real-time verification of delivery and detection of extrahepatic shunting. RSNA, 2008
Authors: Matthias Stuber; Wesley D Gilson; Michael Schär; Dorota A Kedziorek; Lawrence V Hofmann; Saurabh Shah; Evert-Jan Vonken; Jeff W M Bulte; Dara L Kraitchman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Riad Salem; Kenneth G Thurston; Brian I Carr; James E Goin; Jean-Francois H Geschwind Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Johannes F W Nijsen; Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde; Thomas Havenith; Clemens Bos; Chris J G Bakker; Alfred D van het Schip Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-03-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Weiguo Li; Zhuoli Zhang; Andrew C Gordon; Jeane Chen; Jodi Nicolai; Robert J Lewandowski; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Samdeep K Mouli; Patrick Tyler; Joseph L McDevitt; Aaron C Eifler; Yang Guo; Jodi Nicolai; Robert J Lewandowski; Weiguo Li; Daniel Procissi; Robert K Ryu; Y Andrew Wang; Riad Salem; Andrew C Larson; Reed A Omary Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem; Delbert E Day; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Karun V Sharma; Matthew R Dreher; Yiqing Tang; William Pritchard; Oscar A Chiesa; John Karanian; Jennifer Peregoy; Babak Orandi; David Woods; Danielle Donahue; Juan Esparza; Guy Jones; Sean L Willis; Andrew L Lewis; Bradford J Wood Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: W Bult; P R Seevinck; G C Krijger; T Visser; L M J Kroon-Batenburg; C J G Bakker; W E Hennink; A D van het Schip; J F W Nijsen Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: M A D Vente; T C de Wit; M A A J van den Bosch; W Bult; P R Seevinck; B A Zonnenberg; H W A M de Jong; G C Krijger; C J G Bakker; A D van het Schip; J F W Nijsen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 5.315