Literature DB >> 18840662

Two odometers in honeybees?

M Dacke1, M V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Although several studies have examined how honeybees gauge and report the distance and direction of a food source to their nestmates, relatively little is known about how this information is combined to obtain a representation of the position of the food source. In this study we manipulate the amount of celestial compass information available to the bee during flight, and analyse the encoding of spatial information in the waggle dance as well as in the navigation of the foraging bee. We find that the waggle dance encodes information about the total distance flown to the food source, even when celestial compass cues are available only for a part of the journey. This stands in contrast to how a bee gauges distance flown when it navigates back to a food source that it already knows. When bees were trained to find a feeder placed at a fixed distance in a tunnel in which celestial cues were partially occluded and then tested in a tunnel that was fully open to the sky, they searched for the feeder at a distance that corresponds closely to the distance that was flown under the open sky during the training. Thus, when navigating back to a food source, information about distance travelled is disregarded when there is no concurrent input from the celestial compass. We suggest that bees may possess two different odometers - a 'community' odometer that is used to provide information to nestmates via the dance, and a 'personal' odometer that is used by an experienced individual to return to a previously visited source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18840662     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.021022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  A connectome of the Drosophila central complex reveals network motifs suitable for flexible navigation and context-dependent action selection.

Authors:  Brad K Hulse; Hannah Haberkern; Romain Franconville; Daniel Turner-Evans; Shin-Ya Takemura; Tanya Wolff; Marcella Noorman; Marisa Dreher; Chuntao Dan; Ruchi Parekh; Ann M Hermundstad; Gerald M Rubin; Vivek Jayaraman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Optic flow informs distance but not profitability for honeybees.

Authors:  Sharoni Shafir; Andrew B Barron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A desert ant's memory of recent visual experience and the control of route guidance.

Authors:  Matthew Collett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Incorporating variability in honey bee waggle dance decoding improves the mapping of communicated resource locations.

Authors:  Roger Schürch; Margaret J Couvillon; Dominic D R Burns; Kiah Tasman; David Waxman; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Re-visiting of plentiful food sources and food search strategies in desert ants.

Authors:  Harald Wolf; Matthias Wittlinger; Siegfried Bolek
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Automatic detection and decoding of honey bee waggle dances.

Authors:  Fernando Wario; Benjamin Wild; Raúl Rojas; Tim Landgraf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Role of Landscapes and Landmarks in Bee Navigation: A Review.

Authors:  Bahram Kheradmand; James C Nieh
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 8.  Principles of Insect Path Integration.

Authors:  Stanley Heinze; Ajay Narendra; Allen Cheung
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Two distance memories in desert ants-Modes of interaction.

Authors:  Harald Wolf; Matthias Wittlinger; Sarah E Pfeffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.