Literature DB >> 24132490

Incorporating variability in honey bee waggle dance decoding improves the mapping of communicated resource locations.

Roger Schürch1, Margaret J Couvillon, Dominic D R Burns, Kiah Tasman, David Waxman, Francis L W Ratnieks.   

Abstract

Honey bees communicate to nestmates locations of resources, including food, water, tree resin and nest sites, by making waggle dances. Dances are composed of repeated waggle runs, which encode the distance and direction vector from the hive or swarm to the resource. Distance is encoded in the duration of the waggle run, and direction is encoded in the angle of the dancer's body relative to vertical. Glass-walled observation hives enable researchers to observe or video, and decode waggle runs. However, variation in these signals makes it impossible to determine exact locations advertised. We present a Bayesian duration to distance calibration curve using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations that allows us to quantify how accurately distance to a food resource can be predicted from waggle run durations within a single dance. An angular calibration shows that angular precision does not change over distance, resulting in spatial scatter proportional to distance. We demonstrate how to combine distance and direction to produce a spatial probability distribution of the resource location advertised by the dance. Finally, we show how to map honey bee foraging and discuss how our approach can be integrated with Geographic Information Systems to better understand honey bee foraging ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132490     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0860-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

Review 1.  The biology of the dance language.

Authors:  Fred C Dyer
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer".

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; S Zhang; M Altwein; J Tautz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow.

Authors:  H E Esch; S Zhang; M V Srinivasan; J Tautz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability.

Authors:  T D Seeley; A S Mikheyev; G J Pagano
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Working against gravity: horizontal honeybee waggle runs have greater angular scatter than vertical waggle runs.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Hunter L F Phillipps; Roger Schürch; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Variability in the encoding of spatial information by dancing bees.

Authors:  Rodrigo J De Marco; Juan M Gurevitz; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; M Sol Balbuena; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Authors:  Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Arno Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Intra-dance variation among waggle runs and the design of efficient protocols for honey bee dance decoding.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Fiona C Riddell Pearce; Elisabeth L Harris-Jones; Amanda M Kuepfer; Samantha J Mackenzie-Smith; Laura A Rozario; Roger Schürch; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.422

10.  Too much noise on the dance floor: Intra- and inter-dance angular error in honey bee waggle dances.

Authors:  Roger Schürch; Margaret J Couvillon
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2013-01-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Adaptive evolution of honeybee dance dialects.

Authors:  Patrick L Kohl; Neethu Thulasi; Benjamin Rutschmann; Ebi A George; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Axel Brockmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Row crop fields provide mid-summer forage for honey bees.

Authors:  Mary R Silliman; Roger Schürch; Sean Malone; Sally V Taylor; Margaret J Couvillon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Summertime blues: August foraging leaves honey bees empty-handed.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Katherine A Fensome; Shaun Kl Quah; Roger Schürch
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2014-04-09

4.  Honey bees communicate distance via non-linear waggle duration functions.

Authors:  Patrick L Kohl; Benjamin Rutschmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Decrease Foraging But Not Recruitment After Neonicotinoid Exposure.

Authors:  Bradley D Ohlinger; Roger Schürch; Sharif Durzi; Parry M Kietzman; Mary R Silliman; Margaret J Couvillon
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Dance-communicated distances support nectar foraging as a supply-driven system.

Authors:  Bradley D Ohlinger; Roger Schürch; Mary R Silliman; Taylor N Steele; Margaret J Couvillon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.812

7.  Waggle dance distances as integrative indicators of seasonal foraging challenges.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Roger Schürch; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers recruit their nestmates to native forbs in reconstructed prairie habitats?

Authors:  Morgan K Carr-Markell; Cora M Demler; Margaret J Couvillon; Roger Schürch; Marla Spivak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.