Literature DB >> 18836785

Video-assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients.

Gilles Dhonneur1, Widad Abdi, Serge K Ndoko, Roland Amathieu, Nabil Risk, Lodfi El Housseini, Claude Polliand, Gerard Champault, Xavier Combes, Loïc Tual.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared tracheal intubation characteristics and arterial oxygenation quality during airway management of morbidly obese patients whose trachea was intubated under video assistance with the LMA CTrach (SEBAC, Pantin, France) or the Airtraq laryngoscope (VYGON, Ecouen, France) with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.
METHODS: After standardized induction of anesthesia, 318 morbidly obese patients scheduled for elective morbid obesity surgery received tracheal intubation with the LMA CTrach, the Airtraq laryngoscope, or the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. Duration of apnea, time to tracheal intubation, and oxygenation quality during airway management were compared between the LMA CTrach and the laryngoscope groups.
RESULTS: Patients' characteristics were similar in the three groups. The success rate for tracheal intubation was 100% with the LMA CTrach and the Airtraq laryngoscope. One patient of the Macintosh laryngoscope group received LMA CTrach intubation because of early arterial oxygen desaturation associated with unstable facemask ventilation. The duration of apnea was shorter with the LMA CTrach than that of the Airtraq laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. The duration tracheal intubation was shorter with the Airtraq laryngoscope than with the Macintosh laryngoscopes and the LMA CTrach. During airway management, arterial oxygenation was of better quality with the LMA CTrach and the Airtraq laryngoscope than that of the Macintosh laryngoscope.
CONCLUSION: Because LMA CTrach promoted short apnea time and the Airtraq laryngoscope allowed early definitive airway, both video-assisted tracheal intubation devices prevented most serious arterial oxygenation desaturation evidenced during tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients with the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18836785     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9719-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study.

Authors:  C H Maharaj; B D Higgins; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The LMA CTrach in airway resuscitation: six case reports.

Authors:  A J Goldman; W H Rosenblatt
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Tracheal intubation using the Airtraq in morbid obese patients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Gilles Dhonneur; Serge Ndoko; Roland Amathieu; Lodfi El Housseini; Christophe Poncelet; Loic Tual
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A comparison of two techniques for inserting the Airtraq laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  G Dhonneur; S K Ndoko; R Amathieu; A Attias; L E L Housseini; C Polliand; L Tual
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Authors:  S K Ndoko; R Amathieu; L Tual; C Polliand; W Kamoun; L El Housseini; G Champault; G Dhonneur
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale.

Authors:  R M Levitan; E A Ochroch; S Kush; F S Shofer; J E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Use of the fibreoptic intubating LMA-CTrach in two patients with difficult airways.

Authors:  A J Goldman; W H Rosenblatt
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm.

Authors:  Xavier Combes; Bertrand Le Roux; Powen Suen; Marc Dumerat; Cyrus Motamed; Stéphane Sauvat; Philippe Duvaldestin; Gilles Dhonneur
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Chrisen H Maharaj; Elma Buckley; Brian H Harte; John G Laffey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  The Airtraq as a rescue airway device following failed direct laryngoscopy: a case series.

Authors:  C H Maharaj; J F Costello; J G McDonnell; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing perioperative care in bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Daniel P Lemanu; Sanket Srinivasa; Primal P Singh; Sharon Johannsen; Andrew D MacCormick; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Anesthesia for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama; Yumiko Kohno; Keiko Koishi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The LMA CTrach™ in morbidly obese and lean patients undergoing gynecological procedures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tulay Sahin Yildiz; Dilek Ozdamar; Ipek Arslan; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Advances in laryngoscopy: rigid indirect laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Deanne R Cheyne; Patrick Doyle
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-08-19

5.  Do Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea have an Increased Risk of Desaturation During Induction of Anesthesia for Weight Loss Surgery?

Authors:  Matthias Eikermann; Jaime Garzon-Serrano; Jean Kwo; Martina Grosse-Sundrup; Ulrich Schmidt; Luca Bigatello
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2010-06-25

6.  Airtraq, LMA CTrach and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation Training: A Randomized Comparative Manikin Study.

Authors:  Ayten Saraçoğlu; Didem Dal; Ömer Baygın; Fevzi Yılmaz Göğüş
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  The effect of body mass index on intubation success rates and complications during emergency airway management.

Authors:  James M Dargin; Lillian L Emlet; Frank X Guyette
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study.

Authors:  David W Healy; Paul Picton; Michelle Morris; Christopher Turner
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Airway tube exchanger techniques in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Danai Udomtecha
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-09

10.  A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation.

Authors:  David W Healy; Oana Maties; David Hovord; Sachin Kheterpal
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.