Literature DB >> 18829902

Use of a postoperative lumbar corset after lumbar spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the spine. A prospective randomized trial.

A J Yee1, J U Yoo, E B Marsolais, G Carlson, C Poe-Kochert, H H Bohlman, S E Emery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral corsets and braces have been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders. Although their use after lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative conditions has been reported, there is a lack of evidence on which to base guidelines on their use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a postoperative corset on the outcome of lumbar arthrodesis.
METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in which patients who wore a postoperative lumbar corset for eight weeks full-time after a posterior lumbar arthrodesis for a degenerative spinal condition were compared with those who did not use a corset after such an operation. Ninety patients were randomized to one of the two treatments. A history was recorded and patients were assessed with a physical examination, radiographs, and functional outcome questionnaires (the Dallas Pain Questionnaire [DPQ] and the Short Form-36 [SF-36]) preoperatively and at one year and two years following the surgery. The primary outcome measure of the study was the DPQ, a disease-specific patient-derived functional measure of the spine, and secondary end points included the SF-36 scores, complications, rates of fusion as determined radiographically, and reoperation rates.
RESULTS: Follow-up analysis was performed for seventy-two patients, thirty-seven randomized to the brace (experimental) group and thirty-five randomized to the control group. Regardless of the treatment method, the patients had substantial improvement in the disease-specific and general health measures by two years postoperatively. At two years, there was no difference in the DPQ category scores (the primary outcome parameter) of the two treatment groups. There was also no difference in the mean SF-36 component scores at two years. Postoperative complications occurred in 22% and 23% of patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively, and a subsequent lumbar spinal operation was performed in 19% and 14%, respectively. Seven patients (five in the experimental group and two in the control group) with radiographic evidence of nonunion underwent revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not indicate a significant advantage or disadvantage to the use of a postoperative lumbar corset following spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829902     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  [Improve of surgical outcomes in spinal fusion surgery : evidence based peri- and intra-operative aspects to reduce complications and earlier recovery].

Authors:  C Fleege; A Almajali; M Rauschmann; M Rickert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Short-Term Impact of Bracing in Multi-Level Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Ryan Dimentberg; Saurabh Sinha; Gregory Glauser; Ian F Caplan; James M Schuster; Scott D McClintock; Jang W Yoon; Paul J Marcotte; Zarina S Ali; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Bracing as a Postoperative Adjunct to Single-level Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Saurabh Sinha; Ian Caplan; James Schuster; Matthew Piazza; Gregory Glauser; Nikhil Sharma; William Charles Welch; Benjamin Osiemo; Scott Mcclintock; Ali Kemal Ozturk; Neil Rainer Malhotra
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 4.  The orthotic treatment of acute and chronic disease of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kourosh Zarghooni; Frank Beyer; Jan Siewe; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Postoperative bracing after lumbar surgery: a survey amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium.

Authors:  Liedewij Bogaert; Peter Van Wambeke; Tinne Thys; Thijs Willem Swinnen; Wim Dankaerts; Simon Brumagne; Lieven Moke; Koen Peers; Bart Depreitere; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Davide Nasi; Mauro Dobran; Giacomo Pavesi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion-a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Takahiro Makino; Kazuo Yonenobu; Yu Moriguchi; Takenori Oda; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective.

Authors:  Jianan Zhang; Yong Fan; Xin He; Jinpeng Du; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Postoperative bracing practices after elective lumbar spine surgery: A questionnaire study of U.S. spine surgeons.

Authors:  Neil Pathak; Michelle C Scott; Anoop R Galivanche; Patrick J Burroughs; Harold G Moore; Ari S Hilibrand; Rohil Malpani; Marissa Justen; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-02-27

10.  Is postoperative bracing after pedicle screw fixation of spine fractures necessary? Study protocol of the ORNOT study: a randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Arjen Johannes Smits; Jaap Deunk; Agnita Stadhouder; Mark Cornelis Altena; Diederik Hendrik Ruth Kempen; Frank Willem Bloemers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.