Literature DB >> 30488116

Postoperative bracing after lumbar surgery: a survey amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium.

Liedewij Bogaert1, Peter Van Wambeke2, Tinne Thys2, Thijs Willem Swinnen3,4,5, Wim Dankaerts4, Simon Brumagne2,4, Lieven Moke6,7, Koen Peers2, Bart Depreitere8, Lotte Janssens4,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bracing is frequently prescribed following lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. However, previous studies failed to demonstrate the advantage of postoperative lumbar bracing in both short- and long-term outcome in terms of pain, quality of life and fusion rate. The purpose of this study was to assess the prescription patterns and rationale for postoperative bracing amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium.
METHODS: A 16-item online survey was distributed by email to spinal surgeons affiliated to the Spine Society of Belgium (N = 252).
RESULTS: A total of 105 surgeons (42%) completed the survey. The overall bracing frequency following lumbar surgery was 38%. A brace was more often prescribed following the fusion procedures (52%) than after the non-fusion procedures (21%) (p < 0.0001). The majority of surgeons (59%) considered bracing after at least one type of lumbar surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons (73%) reported a significantly higher rate of prescribing postoperative bracing compared to neurosurgeons (44%) (p = 0.003). Pain alleviation (67%) was the main goal for prescribing a postoperative brace. A total of 42% of the surgeons aimed to improve fusion rate by bracing after lumbar fusion procedures. A quasi-equal level of the scientific literature (29%), personal experience (35%) and teaching from peers (36%) was reported to contribute on the attitudes towards prescribing bracing.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bracing was prescribed by Belgian spinal surgeons following more than one-third of lumbar procedures. This was underpinned by beliefs regarding pain alleviation and higher fusion rate. Interestingly, based on the scientific literature these beliefs have been demonstrated to be false. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Orthosis; Postoperative period; Practice pattern; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30488116     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5837-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Braces do not reduce loads on internal spinal fixation devices.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; G Bergmann; F Graichen; G Neff
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The effect of fear of movement beliefs on pain and disability after surgery for lumbar and cervical degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Stephen T Wegener; Caryn Seebach; Yanna Song; Richard L Skolasky; Colleen Thornton; A Jay Khanna; Lee H Riley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Influence of spinal immobilization on consolidation of posterolateral lumbosacral fusion. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric and radiographic analysis.

Authors:  R Johnsson; B Strömqvist; P Axelsson; G Selvik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Engaging physicians in change: results of a safety net quality improvement program to reduce overuse.

Authors:  Chris Cammisa; Gregory Partridge; Cynthia Ardans; Katrina Buehrer; Ben Chapman; Howard Beckman
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Effect of lumbar orthosis on intervertebral mobility. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  P Axelsson; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Use of a postoperative lumbar corset after lumbar spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the spine. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  A J Yee; J U Yoo; E B Marsolais; G Carlson; C Poe-Kochert; H H Bohlman; S E Emery
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Postoperative bracing after spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Debdut Biswas; Peter G Whang; Andrew K Simpson; Glenn R Rechtine; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Davide Nasi; Mauro Dobran; Giacomo Pavesi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Postoperative bracing practices after elective lumbar spine surgery: A questionnaire study of U.S. spine surgeons.

Authors:  Neil Pathak; Michelle C Scott; Anoop R Galivanche; Patrick J Burroughs; Harold G Moore; Ari S Hilibrand; Rohil Malpani; Marissa Justen; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-02-27

3.  An Indication-Based Concept for Stepwise Spinal Orthosis in Low Back Pain According to the Current Literature.

Authors:  Franz Landauer; Klemens Trieb
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.