| Literature DB >> 18827929 |
Tu-Anh Tran1, Marie-Ghislaine de Goër de Herve, Houria Hendel-Chavez, Bamory Dembele, Emilie Le Névot, Karim Abbed, Coralie Pallier, Cécile Goujard, Jacques Gasnault, Jean-François Delfraissy, Anne-Marie Balazuc, Yassine Taoufik.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In HIV-infected patients on long-term HAART, virus persistence in resting long-lived CD4 T cells is a major barrier to curing the infection. Cell quiescence, by favouring HIV latency, reduces the risk of recognition and cell destruction by cytotoxic lymphocytes. Several cell-activation-based approaches have been proposed to disrupt cell quiescence and then virus latency, but these approaches have not eradicated the virus. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a CD4+ T-cell subset with particular activation properties. We investigated the role of these cells in virus persistence in patients on long-term HAART. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18827929 PMCID: PMC2551739 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Definition of the resting Treg and non-Treg working cell populations.
Fig. 1A: FoxP3 expression was examined by flow cytometry following cell permeabilization of PBMCs isolated from HIV-infected patients on long-term HAART (see Methods). FoxP3, CD25 and CD127 expression was analyzed in the HLADR− CD4+ small lymphocyte gate. In Fig. 1B, mRNA was extracted from resting Tregs (CD25hiHLADR− CD69−CD4+ small size T cells) and non-Tregs (CD25−HLADR−CD4+ small size T cells). Quantitative RT-PCR was then used to quantify FoxP3 and GAPDH cDNA. Results are expressed as relative units: FoxP3/GAPDH cDNA ratios (atograms/femtograms) and correspond to the mean±SEM of values obtained in 3 donors. Fig. 1C: Sorted resting non-Tregs (CD25−HLADR−CD4+small size T cells) were activated with plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb in the absence or presence of resting Tregs (CD25hiHLADR− CD4+ small size T cells) (>99% FoxP3+) at ratios ranging from 1/10 to 1/1. Cell proliferation was measured. Results (mean±SEM, n = 2) were expressed as the percentage inhibition of proliferation compared to control cultures (without resting Tregs). Fig. 1D: 100 000 sorted CD25−HLADR−CD4+ T cells (black columns) or CD25+HLADR−CD4+T cells (white columns) (obtained as described in Methods) were cultured with plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb±soluble anti-CD28 mAb or with PHA+IL-2. Controls were untreated cells. In Fig. 1E, 100 000 freshly purified CD25−HLADR−CD4+ (black columns) or CD25+HLADR−CD4+ (white columns) T cells (see methods) were also co-cultured with 20 000 mature monocyte-derived DCs loaded in the immature state with a mix of recall antigens (Cytomegalovirus CMV, Purified Protein Derivative PPD, Tetanus toxoid TT and HIV p24). Controls were co-cultures of non-antigen-loaded mature DCs and T cells. Proliferation was evaluated on day 3 for anti-CD3±anti-CD28 activation and on days 3 and 7 for co-culture with mature DCs by measuring thymidine incorporation. Results are expressed as the difference between activated wells and control wells. The results are means±SEM for 4 patients.
Immunovirological profiles of the study patients.
| Number of patients | Time with undetectable plasma virus load (years) | CD4+ T cell count at the time of study (cells/mm | FoxP3+ cells in HLADR-CD4+ T cells (%) | FoxP3+ CD25+cells in HLADR- CD4+ T cells (%) | FoxP3+ CD25hi cells in HLADR-CD4+ 3 T cells (%) |
| 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1 reports immunovirological features of patients tested in virus detection and quantification experiments (experiments shown in Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, Table 2 and supplementary Figure S1). Patients were on triple drug regimens which included 2 nucleoside analogues (Zidovudine, Lamuvidine, Stavudine , Didanosine, Abacavir, Emtricitabine or Tenofovir) in addition to one non- nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (Efavirenz or Nevirapine) or one protease inhibitor (Atazanavir, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir or Saquinavir).
Limit of detection: 20 copies/ml.
Data are expressed as median[quartiles] and (range).
Working cell population for virological analysis.
Figure 2Presence of an HIV reservoir in resting Tregs in patients on prolonged HAART.
Fig. 2A: DNA was extracted and analysed by PCR for HIV Env and GAPDH expression from resting Tregs (CD25hiHLADR− CD69−CD4+ small size T cells) (>99% FoxP3+). Positive and negative controls were total CD4+ T cells from HIV+ and HIV− individuals, respectively. Similar results were obtained in 4 other patients tested. Fig. 2B: quantitation of HIV DNA by real-time PCR as described in Methods, in resting Tregs and non-Tregs (CD25−HLADR− CD69−CD4+ small size T cells). Results are expressed as atogramms of HIV DNA per 100 fentogramms of GAPDH. Results correspond to the mean±SEM of values obtained in 6 patients. Statistical comparison involved the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Fig. 2C: frequencies of HIV DNA harbouring cells assessed by a limiting cell dilution procedure (see Methods) in resting Tregs and non-Tregs from 12 patients. Statistical comparison involved the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Fig. 2D: values of the percentages of HIV DNA harbouring cells in resting Tregs and resting non-Tregs (log10 scale) plotted against time under HAART. The equations of the tendency curves Y = Ae-λt are indicated. The half life of latent Treg and non T reg reservoirs T1/2 (months) was determined as follows: ln2/λ.
Infected Tregs could release virus in activation conditions that disrupt their quiescence.
| Untreated resting Tregs | Resting Tregs PHA+IL-2 | Untreated resting non-Tregs | Resting non-Tregs PHA+IL-2 | |
| 200 000 purified cells | ||||
| Patients with virus producing cells (limit of detection = 20 copies/ml) | 0/21 | 7/21 | 0/23 | 3/23 |
| HIV RNA (log10copies/ml) in positive supernatants (mean±sem) | - | 3.27±1.48 | - | 2.70±0.52 |
150 000 to 200 000 resting Tregs (CD25hiHLADR− CD69−CD4+ small size T cells) (>99% FoxP3+) were activated with PHA+IL-2 or left untreated (controls). Resting non-Tregs (CD25−HLADR− CD69−CD4+ small size T cells) were tested at the exact cell number of 200 000/well. At day 21 of culture, supernatants were assayed for HIV RNA by quantitative RT-PCR (limit of detection of 20 copies/ml).
Figure 3Activated Tregs inhibit granzyme B secretion by CD8 T cells.
PBMC and CD4+ CD25+ cell-depleted PBMCs were assayed in three patients by ELISPOT for granzyme B secretion, following activation with PMA-ionomycin (Fig. 3A) or with overlapping HIV peptide pools corresponding to the p24, reverse transcriptase and Nef regions (Fig. 3B). Results shown in Fig. 3B are numbers of spots per 100 000 CD8+ T cells. Results correspond to the mean±SEM of results obtained in 4 patients.
Figure 4Quiescent Tregs are sensitive to specific CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity.
Fig. 4A: CD25+ cell-depleted PBMCs were activated with PMA-inonomycin then extensively washed. Untreated HLADR−CD25+CD4+ T cells were then added at a physiological ratio. Cells were assayed by ELISPOT for granzyme B. Results correspond to the mean±SEM of results obtained in 2 patients. In Fig. 4B, HIV-specific CTL were co-cultured with CD25+HLADR−CD4+ and CD25−HLADR−CD4+ T cells loaded with HIV peptides. Controls were co-cultures of CD4+ T-cell subsets without peptides. Apoptosis was analyzed following annexin V staining on CD25hiHLADR−CD4+ and CD25−HLADR−CD4+ T cells. Results are expressed as the difference in the percentage of annexin V-positive cells in the presence and absence of HIV peptides. Results correspond to the mean±SEM of results obtained for 7 patients. Statistical comparison involved the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.