Literature DB >> 1882721

Classification of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations. A score system for evaluation of operability and surgical strategy based on an analysis of 66 cases.

B Pertuiset1, D Ancri, Y Kinuta, T Haisa, L Bordi, C Lin, M Mahdi, F Arthuis.   

Abstract

A classification of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is proposed, which is based on a retrospective analysis of the records and results of radical operation in 57 patients between 1983 and 1990. It represents the new developments and more recent technical facilities which influence operability of supratentorial AVMs. Predictability of outcome has been settled upon three groups of factors: anatomical, haemodynamical, and clinical. Anatomical factors are localisation and sectorisation of AVM, determination, caliber and straightening of feeding arteries. Haemodynamical factors are volume of AVM and vascular autoregulation, circulatory velocity of red blood cells in the main arteries of the neck and brain tissue cellular steal. Clinical factors are age, previous rupture of AVM, associated diseases and malformations of vital organs. Each of these factor groups has been divided into parameters to which a code number from 0 to 5 according to the severity of the considered parameter has been attributed. When a contraindication for radical surgery was clearly obvious, as, for example, an AVM with extension to the upper brain stem, number 10 was given. This grading has been done by a team of four persons (3 neurosurgeons including the senior author, and one biophysicist). By adding up all code numbers an Operability Score for a given patient is defined by the number of points, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 69. In cases with a score higher than 30 surgery is not advisable. A score between 21 and 30 indicates that always several staged operations are required, whilst only some of the patients with a score between 11 and 20 may require two stage operative treatment. The AVM in patients with a score under 10 can always be radically excised in a single stage operation. We have been able to demonstrate that the Operability Score allows a reliable prediction of outcome, thus giving indications and contraindications for surgery, and also for the surgical strategy. Moreover, we have explained why surgery had been refused in 9 additional cases during the same period. The causes of 8 fatalities out of 57 surgical cases are analyzed. These 57 cases represent a systematically explored series of the senior author; his experience is based upon 295 personal AVM cases (1958-1990).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1882721     DOI: 10.1007/bf01402041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  11 in total

1.  A new haemodynamic factor in cerebral AVM. Aspiration from the venous system demonstrated in two cases of pedonculo-Galen AVM successfully cured by occlusion of the superior longitudinal sinus.

Authors:  B Pertuiset; D Ancri; M Mahdi; H Nakano; F Arthuis; E Bagnat-Guilly
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Arteriovenous aneurysms of the brain, their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  H OLIVECRONA; J RIIVES
Journal:  Arch Neurol Psychiatry       Date:  1948-05

3.  [Instantaneous measurement of blood flow velocity in internal carotid arteries by pulsed Doppler in cerebral arteriovenous malformations].

Authors:  D Ancri; B Pertuiset
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, Seventh European lecture. Warsaw, March 1, 1986. Predictability of outcome in neurological surgery.

Authors:  B Pertuiset
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  A proposed scheme for grading intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Y Q Shi; X C Chen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Preoperative evaluation of hemodynamic factors in cerebral arteriovenous malformations for selection of a radical surgery tactic with special reference to vascular autoregulation disorders.

Authors:  B Pertuiset; D Ancri; F Clergue
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Shunt-induced haemodynamic disturbances in supratentorial arteriovenous malformations. Brain arteries capacity for autoregulation and flow velocity in the cervical internal carotid arteries.

Authors:  B Pertuiset; D Ancri; F Arthuis; J Y Basset; J Fusciardi; H Nakano
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.447

8.  Anatomical grading of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations for determining operability.

Authors:  A J Luessenhop; T A Gennarelli
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; N A Martin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Hyperemic and ischemic problems of surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  S Mullan; F D Brown; N J Patronas
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Grading of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations on the basis of multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  H G Höllerhage; K M Dewenter; H Dietz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Interventional neuroradiology for the treatment of inaccessible arterio-venous malformations.

Authors:  A Benati
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Validation of the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system for brain arteriovenous malformations in a multicenter cohort of 1009 surgical patients.

Authors:  Helen Kim; Adib A Abla; Jeffrey Nelson; Charles E McCulloch; David Bervini; Michael K Morgan; Christopher Stapleton; Brian P Walcott; Christopher S Ogilvy; Robert F Spetzler; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Prognostic value of the Spetzler's grading system in a series of cerebral AVMs treated by a combined management.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; D Amat; Y Bascoulergue
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Evaluating performance of the spetzler-martin supplemented model in selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformation for surgery.

Authors:  Helen Kim; Tony Pourmohamad; Erick M Westbroek; Charles E McCulloch; Michael T Lawton; William L Young
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Does eloquence subtype influence outcome following arteriovenous malformation surgery?

Authors:  Justin R Mascitelli; Seungwon Yoon; Tyler S Cole; Helen Kim; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery.

Authors:  Michael T Lawton; Helen Kim; Charles E McCulloch; Bahar Mikhak; William L Young
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  The combined management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Experience with 100 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; Y Bascoulergue; D Amat
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Neurosurgical treatment or not?

Authors:  J W ter Berg; D W Dippel; J D Habbema; C J Westermann; C A Tulleken; J Willemse
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Diagnosis and evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Andrew Conger; Charles Kulwin; Michael T Lawton; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.