Literature DB >> 1414513

Grading of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations on the basis of multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

H G Höllerhage1, K M Dewenter, H Dietz.   

Abstract

The case histories and angiograms of 93 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for arteriovenous malformations were analyzed retrospectively to find clinical and radiological prognostic factors influencing the outcome. A stepwise multiple regression was performed as follows. All radiological data such as size, location, and feeding and draining vessels as well as the clinical data such as age, sex, clinical grade on admission were introduced into the model and tested whether they contributed significantly to the prediction of the outcome which was the target variable. If so they were retained, otherwise eliminated. By this procedure the following features were identified as significant prognostic factors which adversely influence the outcome: poor clinical grade, feeding vessels from the A 1-segment and the anterior communicating artery, feeders from the M 1-segment, feeders from the Rolandic branches of the middle cerebral artery, a shunt through the anterior communicating artery. Neither the presence of a particular draining vein nor the type of the venous drainage when divided into superficial or deep had an influence on the outcome. Nor was the size of the lesion of significant importance. The bearing of these findings on the value of established grading systems is discussed and a new grading system is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1414513     DOI: 10.1007/bf01400609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  12 in total

1.  Surgical versus conservative treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a study in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  L Pellettieri; C A Carlsson; S Grevsten; G Norlén; C Uhlemann
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1979

2.  A proposed scheme for grading intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Y Q Shi; X C Chen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Arteriovenous anomalies of the brain. Fate of patients not having definitive surgery.

Authors:  H J Svien; J A McRae
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  AVM grading in assessing surgical risk.

Authors:  A J Luessenhop
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Anatomical grading of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations for determining operability.

Authors:  A J Luessenhop; T A Gennarelli
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; N A Martin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Classification of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations. A score system for evaluation of operability and surgical strategy based on an analysis of 66 cases.

Authors:  B Pertuiset; D Ancri; Y Kinuta; T Haisa; L Bordi; C Lin; M Mahdi; F Arthuis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients. Results of a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  K C Petruk; M West; G Mohr; B K Weir; B G Benoit; F Gentili; L B Disney; M I Khan; M Grace; R O Holness
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  [Neurosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations].

Authors:  H G Höllerhage
Journal:  Neurochirurgia (Stuttg)       Date:  1988-09

10.  Early versus late intracranial aneurysm surgery in subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  D Chyatte; N C Fode; T M Sundt
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  9 in total

1.  Validation of the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system for brain arteriovenous malformations in a multicenter cohort of 1009 surgical patients.

Authors:  Helen Kim; Adib A Abla; Jeffrey Nelson; Charles E McCulloch; David Bervini; Michael K Morgan; Christopher Stapleton; Brian P Walcott; Christopher S Ogilvy; Robert F Spetzler; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Prognostic value of the Spetzler's grading system in a series of cerebral AVMs treated by a combined management.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; D Amat; Y Bascoulergue
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Evaluating performance of the spetzler-martin supplemented model in selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformation for surgery.

Authors:  Helen Kim; Tony Pourmohamad; Erick M Westbroek; Charles E McCulloch; Michael T Lawton; William L Young
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Does eloquence subtype influence outcome following arteriovenous malformation surgery?

Authors:  Justin R Mascitelli; Seungwon Yoon; Tyler S Cole; Helen Kim; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery.

Authors:  Michael T Lawton; Helen Kim; Charles E McCulloch; Bahar Mikhak; William L Young
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Diagnosis and evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Andrew Conger; Charles Kulwin; Michael T Lawton; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-12

7.  Microsurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformation: Long-term outcomes in 445 patients.

Authors:  Qingqing Ren; Min He; Yunhui Zeng; Zhiyong Liu; Hao Liu; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Christopher S Graffeo; Arjun Sahgal; Antonio De Salles; Laura Fariselli; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Ian Paddick; Jean Marie Regis; Jason Sheehan; John Suh; Shoji Yomo; Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Systematic review of brain arteriovenous malformation grading systems evaluating microsurgical treatment recommendation.

Authors:  Basil E Grüter; Wenhua Sun; Jorn Fierstra; Luca Regli; Menno R Germans
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.