Literature DB >> 7754816

Prognostic value of the Spetzler's grading system in a series of cerebral AVMs treated by a combined management.

R Deruty1, I Pelissou-Guyotat, C Mottolese, D Amat, Y Bascoulergue.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of the Spetzler's grading system is studied in a series of 52 AVMs treated by a combined management, using one or several of the 3 available techniques: surgical resection, endovascular embolization, radiosurgery. The symptoms at the time of treatment were haemorrhage 50%, seizures 31%, headache and deficit 19%. Three grade groups were considered: I and II (31%), III (33%), IV and V (36%). Overall, AVMs were managed as follows: resection alone 25%, embolization plus resection 23%, embolization alone 23%, radiosurgery with various combinations 29%. According to the grade groups, the most frequently used technique was resection alone for grade I-II AVMs (44%), radiosurgery for grade III AVMs (41%) and embolization alone for grade IV-V AVMs (42%). The clinical outcome was evaluated in terms of deterioration due to treatment. The best results were obtained in grade I-II AVMs (81% with no deterioration) then in grade III AVMs (65%) and in grade IV-V (58%). However, when we consider the outcome in terms of favourable results (no or only minor deterioration) we obtained a similar outcome for grade I-II and grade III AVMs (94% each), and only 79% for grade IV-V malformations. The angiographic outcome showed a better eradication rate in grade III AVMs (88% complete eradication), than in grade I-II AVMs (75%) and in grade IV-V (47%). Our conclusion is that the Spetzler's grading system in this series was well correlated with both the clinical and the angiographic outcome. However, we found no real difference between grade I-II and grade III AVMs. So, in terms of prognostic value, the grade I, II, and III AVMs could be considered together as low-grade malformations, with a better prognosis than the high-grade malformations (grade IV and V).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7754816     DOI: 10.1007/BF01808608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  18 in total

1.  The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  A Pasqualin; G Barone; F Cioffi; L Rosta; R Scienza; R Da Pian
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Grading and staged resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; J M Zabramski
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1990

3.  Surgical versus conservative treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a study in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  L Pellettieri; C A Carlsson; S Grevsten; G Norlén; C Uhlemann
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1979

4.  [Arteriovenous malformations in deep cerebral area. Topographic classification. Therapeutic possibilities and results about 46 cases (authors' translation)].

Authors:  E Laine; M Jomin; J Clarisse; G Combelles
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.553

5.  Anatomical grading of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations for determining operability.

Authors:  A J Luessenhop; T A Gennarelli
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; N A Martin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  [Prognostic importance of the study of venous drainage in cerebral arteriovenous aneurysms].

Authors:  P Dobbelaere; M Jomin; J Clarisse; E Laine
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Classification of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations. A score system for evaluation of operability and surgical strategy based on an analysis of 66 cases.

Authors:  B Pertuiset; D Ancri; Y Kinuta; T Haisa; L Bordi; C Lin; M Mahdi; F Arthuis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: factors influencing the surgical difficulty and outcome.

Authors:  N Tamaki; K Ehara; T K Lin; K Kuwamura; Y Obora; Y Kanazawa; H Yamashita; S Matsumoto
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: relationship between clinical factors and surgical complications.

Authors:  H H Batjer; M D Devous; G B Seibert; P D Purdy; F J Bonte
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  4 in total

1.  Application of a Novel Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Endovascular Grading Scale for Transarterial Embolization.

Authors:  D L Bell; T M Leslie-Mazwi; A J Yoo; J D Rabinov; W E Butler; J E Bell; J A Hirsch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  A proposal for a new arteriovenous malformation grading scale for neuroendovascular procedures and literature review.

Authors:  Caleb E Feliciano; Ramón de León-Berra; Manuel S Hernández-Gaitán; Rafael Rodríguez-Mercado
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.705

3.  Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Multicenter Propensity-Adjusted Analysis of the Effects of Preoperative Embolization.

Authors:  Joshua S Catapano; Fabio A Frisoli; Candice L Nguyen; D Andrew Wilkinson; Neil Majmundar; Tyler S Cole; Jacob F Baranoski; Alexander C Whiting; Helen Kim; Andrew F Ducruet; Felipe C Albuquerque; Daniel L Cooke; Robert F Spetzler; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Multimodal Treatment Strategy for Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain.

Authors:  Bikei Ryu; Tatsuya Ishikawa; Takakazu Kawamata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.