Literature DB >> 18824184

Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.

François Champoux1, Franco Lepore, Jean-Pierre Gagné, Hugo Théoret.   

Abstract

It has been shown that visual stimulation can activate cortical regions normally devoted to auditory processing in deaf individuals. This neural activity can persist even when audition is restored through the implantation of a cochlear implant, raising the possibility that cross-modal plasticity can be detrimental to auditory performance in cochlear implant users. To determine the influence of visual information on auditory performance after restoration of hearing in deaf individuals, the ability to segregate conflicting auditory and visual information was assessed in fourteen cochlear implant users with varied degree of expertise and an equal number of participants with normal-hearing matched for gender, age and hearing performance. An auditory speech recognition task was administered in the presence of three incongruent visual stimuli (color-shift, random-dot motion and lip movement). For proficient cochlear implant users, auditory performance was equal to that of controls in the three experimental conditions where visual stimuli were presented simultaneously with auditory information. For non-proficient cochlear implant users, performance did not differ from that of matched controls when the auditory stimulus was paired with a visual stimulus that was color-shifted. However, significant differences were observed between the non-proficient cochlear implant users and their matched controls when the accompanying visual stimuli consisted of a moving random-dot pattern or incongruent lip movements. These findings raise several questions with regards to the rehabilitation of cochlear implant users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18824184     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Amal Isaiah; Tara Vongpaisal; Andrew J King; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Early ERP Signature of Hearing Impairment in Visual Rhyme Judgment.

Authors:  Elisabet Classon; Mary Rudner; Mikael Johansson; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-06

7.  Audiovisual segregation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Simon Landry; Benoit A Bacon; Jacqueline Leybaert; Jean-Pierre Gagné; François Champoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Short-term visual deprivation reduces interference effects of task-irrelevant facial expressions on affective prosody judgments.

Authors:  Ineke Fengler; Elena Nava; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22

9.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Internet video telephony allows speech reading by deaf individuals and improves speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Claudia Dähler; Patrick Dubach; Martin Kompis; Marco D Caversaccio; Pascal Senn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.