UNLABELLED: To reduce imaging costs, we designed a head holder for scanning two rats simultaneously in small animal PET scanners. Our goals were (i) to maintain high sensitivity and (ii) to minimize repositioning error between scans. METHODS: A semi-stereotaxic dual rat head holder was designed and constructed for dual rat scanning in our IndyPET-II scanner and the commercial microPET P4. It was also used for single rat scanning in a small-bore, high-resolution animal scanner ("ISAP"). Positional repeatability was validated via multiple [11C]Raclopride scans of a single rat on different days. Accuracy of repositioning was determined by visual comparison of images, and by metrics derived through image alignment. Kinetic validation was assessed via analysis of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) dynamic PET studies of six rats. Each rat was scanned twice: once individually, with brain positioned at the center of field of view (CFOV), and once with a partner, with brain away from CFOV. Both rats were injected with FDG during each dual rat session. Patlak uptake constants (Ki) were calculated from whole brain images. Effects of attenuation and scatter correction on single versus dual scan images were explored. RESULTS: Image comparison and alignment metrics indicated excellent repositioning of rats. Scaled time-activity-curves from single and dual rat scans were indistinguishable. Average single and dual scan Ki values differed by only 6.3+/-7.5%. CONCLUSION: Dual rat scanning in a semi-stereotaxic holder is practical for economical small animal scanning and does not compromise kinetic accuracy of [18F]FDG dynamic scan data.
UNLABELLED: To reduce imaging costs, we designed a head holder for scanning two rats simultaneously in small animal PET scanners. Our goals were (i) to maintain high sensitivity and (ii) to minimize repositioning error between scans. METHODS: A semi-stereotaxic dual rat head holder was designed and constructed for dual rat scanning in our IndyPET-II scanner and the commercial microPET P4. It was also used for single rat scanning in a small-bore, high-resolution animal scanner ("ISAP"). Positional repeatability was validated via multiple [11C]Raclopride scans of a single rat on different days. Accuracy of repositioning was determined by visual comparison of images, and by metrics derived through image alignment. Kinetic validation was assessed via analysis of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) dynamic PET studies of six rats. Each rat was scanned twice: once individually, with brain positioned at the center of field of view (CFOV), and once with a partner, with brain away from CFOV. Both rats were injected with FDG during each dual rat session. Patlak uptake constants (Ki) were calculated from whole brain images. Effects of attenuation and scatter correction on single versus dual scan images were explored. RESULTS: Image comparison and alignment metrics indicated excellent repositioning of rats. Scaled time-activity-curves from single and dual rat scans were indistinguishable. Average single and dual scan Ki values differed by only 6.3+/-7.5%. CONCLUSION: Dual rat scanning in a semi-stereotaxic holder is practical for economical small animal scanning and does not compromise kinetic accuracy of [18F]FDG dynamic scan data.
Authors: C Tai; A Chatziioannou; S Siegel; J Young; D Newport; R N Goble; R E Nutt; S R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Tsuyoshi Tada; Mike Wendland; Nathan Watson; Nagato Kuriyama; Hiroko Kuriyama; Tim Roberts; Michael Burns; William Weiss; Mark A Israel Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2002-04-30 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Jenna M Sullivan; Shannon L Risacher; Marc D Normandin; Karmen K Yoder; Janice C Froehlich; Evan D Morris Journal: Synapse Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Min Wang; Karmen K Yoder; Mingzhang Gao; Bruce H Mock; Xiao-Ming Xu; Andrew J Saykin; Gary D Hutchins; Qi-Huang Zheng Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Kyle M Gilbert; Justine C Cléry; Joseph S Gati; Yuki Hori; Kevin D Johnston; Alexander Mashkovtsev; Janahan Selvanayagam; Peter Zeman; Ravi S Menon; David J Schaeffer; Stefan Everling Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 14.919