Literature DB >> 18823745

Acetabular component revision using a porous tantalum biomaterial: a case series.

Arthur L Malkani1, Matthew R Price, Charles H Crawford, Dale L Baker.   

Abstract

Biologic ingrowth can be difficult to achieve in acetabular component revision, especially in cases with significant bone loss. The purpose of this study was to review our clinical results of acetabular component revisions in patients with significant bone loss using a porous tantalum biomaterial. This is a retrospective review of 25 patients. There were 16 females and 9 males with a mean age of 71.7 +/- 10.54 years. The mean follow up was 39 +/- 11.09 months (range, 28-55 months). All patients in this series had combined segmental and cavitary bone loss, Paprosky type 2 or type 3. Of 22 patients in this series, 21 had a well-fixed and functioning implant at latest follow up. All 21 patients developed ingrowth along the tantalum surface despite compromised host bone. There were no cases of dislocation or aseptic loosening. Porous tantalum appears to be a promising material for use in revision hip arthroplasty to facilitate biologic ingrowth in patients with acetabular bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823745     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights®: Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Development of a cartilage composite utilizing porous tantalum, fibrin, and rabbit chondrocytes for treatment of cartilage defect.

Authors:  Kamal Jamil; Kien-Hui Chua; Samad Joudi; Sook-Luan Ng; Nor Hamdan Yahaya
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Radiolucency around highly porous sockets and hydroxyapatite-coated porous sockets in total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imai; Joji Miyawaki; Tomomi Kamada; Akira Maruishi; Jun Takeba; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-11-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.