Literature DB >> 18823742

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.

Dan Williams1, Matt Royle, Mark Norton.   

Abstract

The aim of this dry bone study was to determine the range of hip motion to impingement for different hip resurfacing cup positions and component sizes. The maximum angles of hip flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction were calculated from 3-dimensional coordinates for: 1. Cup inclination of 30 degrees , 40 degrees , 50 degrees , 60 degrees , and 70 degrees with fixed anteversion; 2. Cup anteversion of 0 degrees , 10 degrees , 25 degrees , 35 degrees , and 45 degrees with fixed inclination; and 3. 3 different component sizes on the same size dry bones. An acetabular component inclination of 50 degrees and an anteversion of 25 degrees allowed the most physiologic range of hip motion. A larger-diameter femoral component relative to the native femoral neck diameter resulted in a greater range of hip motion to impingement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823742     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle.

Authors:  Hsiao-Che Lin; Wei-Min Chi; Ying-Jui Ho; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Accuracy of the modified Hardinge approach in acetabular positioning.

Authors:  Prateek Goyal; Adrian Lau; Richard McCalden; Matthew G Teeter; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  A painful soft tissue mass secondary to impingement of a metal on polyethylene bearing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Griffiths-Jones William; Williams Daniel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-20

6.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016?

Authors:  Edward J Silverman; Blair Ashley; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

7.  The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution.

Authors:  Michael P Murphy; Cameron J Killen; Steven J Ralles; Nicholas M Brown; Albert J Song; Karen Wu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Followup.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Andrea Volpin; Jonathan Bartlett; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Acetabular cup version modelling and its clinical applying on plain radiograms.

Authors:  Anton Denisov; Stanislav Bilyk; Anton Kovalenko
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

10.  Augmented Reality Based Navigation for Computer Assisted Hip Resurfacing: A Proof of Concept Study.

Authors:  He Liu; Edouard Auvinet; Joshua Giles; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.