Literature DB >> 18823449

Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

Patrick S Romano1, Hillary J Mull, Peter E Rivard, Shibei Zhao, William G Henderson, Susan Loveland, Dennis Tsilimingras, Cindy L Christiansen, Amy K Rosen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the criterion validity of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) using clinical data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). DATA SOURCES: Fifty five thousand seven hundred and fifty two matched hospitalizations from 2001 VA inpatient surgical discharge data and NSQIP chart-abstracted data. STUDY
DESIGN: We examined the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), and positive likelihood ratios of five surgical PSIs that corresponded to NSQIP adverse events. We created and tested alternative definitions of each PSI. DATA COLLECTION: FY01 inpatient discharge data were merged with 2001 NSQIP data abstracted from medical records for major noncardiac surgeries. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Sensitivities were 19-56 percent for original PSI definitions; and 37-63 percent using alternative PSI definitions. PPVs were 22-74 percent and did not improve with modifications. Positive likelihood ratios were 65-524 using original definitions, and 64-744 using alternative definitions. "Postoperative respiratory failure" and "postoperative wound dehiscence" exhibited significant increases in sensitivity after modifications.
CONCLUSIONS: PSI sensitivities and PPVs were moderate. For three of the five PSIs, AHRQ has incorporated our alternative, higher sensitivity definitions into current PSI algorithms. Further validation should be considered before most of the PSIs evaluated herein are used to publicly compare or reward hospital performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823449      PMCID: PMC2669628          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00905.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?

Authors:  E P McCarthy; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?

Authors:  A G Lawthers; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; L E Peterson; R H Palmer; L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Asking too much of administrative data?

Authors:  Patrick S Romano
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The validity of ICD-9-CM codes in identifying postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; James Battles; Yen-Pin Chiang; David Hunt
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-06

5.  Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.

Authors:  S N Weingart; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies; N J Banks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Chester L Davis; John R Pierce; William Henderson; C David Spencer; Christine Tyler; Robert Langberg; Jennan Swafford; Gladys S Felan; Martha A Kearns; Brigitte Booker
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  William R Best; Shukri F Khuri; Maureen Phelan; Kwan Hur; William G Henderson; John G Demakis; Jennifer Daley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources.

Authors:  James M Naessens; Claudia R Campbell; Bjorn Berg; Arthur R Williams; Richard Culbertson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  How often are potential patient safety events present on admission?

Authors:  Robert L Houchens; Anne Elixhauser; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

10.  Do the AHRQ patient safety indicators flag conditions that are present at the time of hospital admission?

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Maureen A Thompson; Tsui-Ying Kau; Hsou Mei Hu; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  38 in total

1.  Increases in mortality, length of stay, and cost associated with hospital-acquired infections in trauma patients.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Pat W Stone; Dana B Mukamel; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-21

2.  Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety Indicators.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Ann M Borzecki; Susan Loveland; Kathleen Hickson; Qi Chen; Sally MacDonald; Marlena H Shin; Marisa Cevasco; Kamal M F Itani; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].

Authors:  E Hanisch; T F Weigel; A Buia; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Determinants of adverse events in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Kathryn M McDonald; John M Morton; Ronald L Dalman; Fritz R Bech
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Patient safety in the era of the 80-hour workweek.

Authors:  Julia Shelton; Kristy Kummerow; Sharon Phillips; Patrick G Arbogast; Marie Griffin; Michael D Holzman; William Nealon; Benjamin K Poulose
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Venous thromboembolism after joint replacement in older male veterans with comorbidity.

Authors:  Alok Kapoor; Priscilla Chew; Rebecca A Silliman; Elaine M Hylek; Jeffrey N Katz; Howard Cabral; Dan Berlowitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Biliary and vascular anomalies in living liver donors: the role and accuracy of pre-operative radiological mapping.

Authors:  Maja Segedi; Andrzej K Buczkowski; Charles H Scudamore; Eric M Yoshida; Alison C Harris; Kristin DeGirolamo; Stephen W Chung
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Impact of including readmissions for qualifying events in the patient safety indicators.

Authors:  Sheryl M Davies; Olga Saynina; Laurence C Baker; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Effects of resident duty hour reform on surgical and procedural patient safety indicators among hospitalized Veterans Health Administration and Medicare patients.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Susan A Loveland; Patrick S Romano; Kamal M F Itani; Jeffrey H Silber; Orit O Even-Shoshan; Michael J Halenar; Yun Teng; Jingsan Zhu; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.