Literature DB >> 11893128

Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

William R Best1, Shukri F Khuri, Maureen Phelan, Kwan Hur, William G Henderson, John G Demakis, Jennifer Daley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) employs trained nurse data collectors to prospectively gather preoperative patient characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes for most major operations in 123 DVA hospitals to provide risk-adjusted outcomes to centers as quality indicators. It has been suggested that routine hospital discharge abstracts contain the same information and would provide accurate and complete data at much lower cost. STUDY
DESIGN: With preoperative risks and 30-day outcomes recorded by trained data collectors as criteria standards, ICD-9-CM hospital discharge diagnosis codes in the Patient Treatment File (PTF) were tested for sensitivity and positive predictive value. ICD-9-CM codes for 61 preoperative patient characteristics and 21 postoperative adverse events were identified.
RESULTS: Moderately good ICD-9-CM matches of descriptions were found for 37 NSQIP preoperative patient characteristics (61%); good data were available from other automated sources for another 15 (25%). ICD-9-CM coding was available for only 13 (45%) of the top 29 predictor variables. In only three (23%) was sensitivity and in only four (31%) was positive predictive value greater than 0.500. There were ICD-9-CM matches for all 21 NSQIP postoperative adverse events; multiple matches were appropriate for most. Postoperative occurrence was implied in only 41%; same breadth of clinical description in only 23%. In only four (7%) was sensitivity and only two (4%) was positive predictive value greater than 0.500.
CONCLUSION: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of administrative data in comparison to NSQIP data were poor. We cannot recommend substitution of administrative data for NSQIP data methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11893128     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01183-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  55 in total

1.  The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration.

Authors:  Denise M Hynes; Ruth A Perrin; Steven Rappaport; Joanne M Stevens; John G Demakis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The evolving science of quality measurement for hospitals: implications for studies of competition and consolidation.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Ryan Mutter
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

4.  The sensitivity of adverse event cost estimates to diagnostic coding error.

Authors:  Gavin Wardle; Walter P Wodchis; Audrey Laporte; Geoffrey M Anderson; G Ross Baker
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Prospective evaluation of in-hospital mortality with the P-POSSUM scoring system in patients undergoing major digestive surgery.

Authors:  Féthi Merad; Gabriel Baron; Blandine Pasquet; Henry Hennet; Gérard Kohlmann; Fred Warlin; Bruno Desrousseaux; Abe Fingerhut; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-Marie Hay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Use of diagnosis codes and/or wound culture results for surveillance of surgical site infection after mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 7.  The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Robert M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rodney P Bensley; Ruby C Lo; Allan D Hamden; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.