Literature DB >> 18822359

Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer1, Jiri Aubrecht, Jos C Kleinjans, Hans-Juergen Ahr.   

Abstract

Specific genotoxic events such as gene mutations and/or chromosome damage are considered hallmarks of cancer. The genotoxicity testing battery enables relatively simple, rapid and inexpensive hazard identification, namely by assessing a chemical's ability to cause genetic damage in cells. In addition, the 2-year rodent carcinogenicity bioassay provides an assessment of a risk associated with the chemical to develop cancer in animals. Although the link between genotoxicity and carcinogenicity is well documented, this relationship is complicated due to the impact of non-genotoxic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and by character of the in vitro genotoxicity assays and specific endpoints making the interpretation of test results in light of human risk and relevance difficult. In particular, the specificity of test results has been questioned. Therefore, the development of novel scientific approaches bridging genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing via understanding underlying mechanisms is extremely important for facilitating cancer risk assessment. In this respect, toxicogenomics approaches are considered promising as these have the potential of providing generic insight in molecular pathway responses. The goal of this report thus is to review recent progress in the development and application of toxicogenomics to the derivation of genomic biomarkers associated with mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the potential for application of genomic approaches to hazard identification and risk assessment is explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18822359     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  17 in total

1.  Intrinsic bio-signature of gene delivery nanocarriers may impair gene therapy goals.

Authors:  Jaleh Barar; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2013-09-17

2.  Assessment of DNA damage in floriculturists in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Camila Mörschbächer Wilhelm; Adriani Kunz Calsing; Luciano Basso da Silva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 4.  Toxicogenomic profiling of chemically exposed humans in risk assessment.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Luoping Zhang; Alan E Hubbard; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Influence of selected anti-cancer drugs on the induction of DNA double-strand breaks and changes in gene expression in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Matjaž Novak; Bojana Žegura; Špela Baebler; Alja Štern; Ana Rotter; Katja Stare; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Technical guide for applications of gene expression profiling in human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Bourdon-Lacombe; Ivy D Moffat; Michelle Deveau; Mainul Husain; Scott Auerbach; Daniel Krewski; Russell S Thomas; Pierre R Bushel; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 7.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  New "Omics" Approaches as Tools to Explore Mechanistic Nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Célia Ventura; Vukosava Torres; Luís Vieira; Bruno Gomes; António Sebastião Rodrigues; José Rueff; Deborah Penque; Maria João Silva
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  GADD45 in Stress Signaling, Cell Cycle Control, and Apoptosis.

Authors:  Arslon Humayun; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Performance in omics analyses of blood samples in long-term storage: opportunities for the exploitation of existing biobanks in environmental health research.

Authors:  Dennie G A J Hebels; Panagiotis Georgiadis; Hector C Keun; Toby J Athersuch; Paolo Vineis; Roel Vermeulen; Lützen Portengen; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Göran Hallmans; Domenico Palli; Benedetta Bendinelli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Salvatore Panico; Jos C S Kleinjans; Theo M C M de Kok; Martyn T Smith; Soterios A Kyrtopoulos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.