Literature DB >> 18821324

Downward percentile crossing as an indicator of an adverse prenatal environment.

Michelle Lampl1, Francesca Gotsch, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Jimmy Espinoza, Luis Gonçalves, Ricardo Gomez, Jyh Kae Nien, Edward A Frongillo, Roberto Romero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postnatal health sequelae of low birth weight have been attributed to 'poor fetal growth' from inferred adverse prenatal environments; risks augmented by infant growth rates. Identifying prenatal growth-restricting events is essential to clarify pathways and mechanisms of fetal growth. AIM: The specific aim of this investigation was to examine whether an episode of preterm labor may compromise fetal growth. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fetal size at the end of the second trimester and birth were compared among women with uncomplicated pregnancies (n = 3167) and those who experienced an episode of preterm labor (<37 weeks) and subsequently delivered at term (> or =37 weeks, n = 147). Fetal weight estimated from ultrasound measures, and changes in weight standard scores across the third trimester investigated significant centile crossing (>0.67 standard deviation score change).
RESULTS: Fetuses delivered at term after an episode of preterm labor were smaller at birth relative to their peers than at the end of the second trimester, and were 47% more likely to experience clinically significant downward centile crossing (p < 0.05) than their peers (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07).
CONCLUSION: An episode of preterm labor may signal an adverse prenatal environment for term-delivered neonates. Epidemiologically silent events in the natural history of pregnancy are an understudied source of fetal growth compromise as inferred by small birth size among peers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18821324      PMCID: PMC3163444          DOI: 10.1080/03014460802311062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  41 in total

1.  Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?

Authors:  P J Danielian; A C Allman; P J Steer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-06

2.  Intrauterine growth retardation: let's be clear about it.

Authors:  D G Altman; F E Hytten
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-10

3.  Shifting linear growth during infancy: illustration of genetic factors in growth from fetal life through infancy.

Authors:  D W Smith; W Truog; J E Rogers; L J Greitzer; A L Skinner; J J McCann; M A Harvey
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  The California Child Health and Development Studies of the School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.

Authors:  B J van den Berg; R E Christianson; F W Oechsli
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Compensatory maturational deceleration of growth or "catch-down growth" in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia after delayed initiation of therapy.

Authors:  U Hunziker; R Largo; M Zachmann; A Prader
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  The ultrastructure of the arterial supply of the human placenta in pregnancy complicated by fetal growth retardation.

Authors:  B L Sheppard; J Bonnar
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1976-12

7.  Do growth chart centiles need a face lift?

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-05

8.  Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?

Authors:  J Gardosi
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-09

9.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?

Authors:  J F Stratton; S N Scanaill; B Stuart; M J Turner
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of lipid-based nutrient supplements by HIV-infected Malawian women during lactation has no effect on infant growth from 0 to 24 weeks.

Authors:  Valerie L Flax; Margaret E Bentley; Charles S Chasela; Dumbani Kayira; Michael G Hudgens; Rodney J Knight; Alice Soko; Denise J Jamieson; Charles M van der Horst; Linda S Adair
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Is an episode of suspected preterm labor that subsequently leads to a term delivery benign?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Offer Erez; Eli Maymon; Percy Pacora
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Lipid-based nutrient supplements are feasible as a breastmilk replacement for HIV-exposed infants from 24 to 48 weeks of age.

Authors:  Valerie L Flax; Margaret E Bentley; Charles S Chasela; Dumbani Kayira; Michael G Hudgens; Kopekani Z Kacheche; Charity Chavula; Athena P Kourtis; Denise J Jamieson; Charles M van der Horst; Linda S Adair
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.798

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.