Literature DB >> 7719861

Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?

J F Stratton1, S N Scanaill, B Stuart, M J Turner.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify, by means of two third-trimester scans, fetuses with ultrasound evidence of inadequate growth but who were born with birth weights above the 10th centile for gestational age; and to determine if these infants constitute a high-risk group by comparing the incidence of obstetric intervention, of intrapartum complications and of neonatal morbidity between this group and the group of infants who showed no ultrasound evidence of intrauterine growth restraint. A total of 285 women with singleton pregnancies who were referred for a third-trimester ultrasound examination were included in this prospective study. Fetal weight was estimated by ultrasound twice in the third trimester and at each examination was assigned a centile score. A fall of > 20 centiles was taken as evidence of inadequate growth. The outcomes measured were the incidence of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler, induction of labor, meconiumstaining of the liquor, intrapartum fetal blood sampling, operative vaginal delivery, Cesarean section, Apgar score of < 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Seventy-five patients showed a drop of > 20 centiles between the first and second scans. The incidence of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was greater in those infants who had ultrasound evidence of growth restraint. We conclude that infants of normal birth weight with inadequate growth diagnosed on ultrasound are not at increased risk, they have an increased incidence of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and they are more commonly found in mothers with diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7719861     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05020114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  5 in total

1.  Downward percentile crossing as an indicator of an adverse prenatal environment.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Francesca Gotsch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Jimmy Espinoza; Luis Gonçalves; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Edward A Frongillo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 2.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Jacqueline E A K Bamfo; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2011-04-13

4.  Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Tilman Brand; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Care-Related and Maternal Risk Factors Associated with the Antenatal Nondetection of Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Case-Control Study from Bremen, Germany.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Tilman Brand; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.