Literature DB >> 16205353

The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Rudolf Bertagnoli1, James J Yue, Rahul V Shah, Regina Nanieva, Frank Pfeiffer, Andrea Fenk-Mayer, Trace Kershaw, Daniel S Husted.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal minimum 2-year follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Prodisc implant in patients with disabling single-level discogenic low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of debilitating discogenic LBP has been controversial and varied. To date, a longitudinal prospective study of the treatment of single-level incapacitating discogenic LBP using the Prodisc total disc arthroplasty technique has not been described.
METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 118 patients treated with single-level lumbar Prodisc total disc arthroplasty. Patients 18 to 60 years of age with disabling and recalcitrant discogenic LBP with or without radicular pain secondary to single-level discogenic LBP from L3 to S1 were included. Patients were assessed before surgery, and outcome measurements were after surgery administered at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (88%) fulfilled all follow-up criteria. The median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 36-60 years). Statistical improvements in VAS, Oswestry, and patient satisfaction scores occurred 3 months postoperatively. These improvements were maintained at the 24-month follow-up. Radicular pain also decreased significantly. Full-time and part-time work rates increased from 10% to 35% and 3% to 24%, respectively. No additional fusion surgeries were necessary either at the affected or unaffected levels. Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increase from 4 mm to 13 mm (P < 0.001) and an affected disc motion from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-level Prodisc lumbar total disc arthroplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment method for debilitating lumbar discogenic LBP. Significant improvements in patient satisfaction and disability scores occurred after surgery by 3 months and were maintained at the 2-year follow-up. No device-related complications occurred. Patients with severe to moderate disc height loss as well as those with symptomatic posterior anular defects with minimal disc height loss achieve functional gains and significant pain relief. Careful and appropriate patient selection is essential in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16205353     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182217.87660.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Structural problems of the spine do not necessarily require intervention.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Sebastian Hartmann; Michaela Gstöttner; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Gabl; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Bao-Gan Peng
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

5.  Comparison of Single-Level and Multiple-Level Outcomes of Total Disc Arthroplasty: 24-Month Results.

Authors:  Christoph Schätz; Karsten Ritter-Lang; Lutz Gössel; Nadine Dreßler
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 6.  Chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Andrew K Simpson; Jacek Cholewicki; Jonathan Grauer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-12

7.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Is spinal surgery effective for back pain?

Authors:  Nikolai Bogduk; Gunnar Andersson
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-07-27

9.  Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine.

Authors:  Stephane Aunoble; Robert Meyrat; Yasser Al Sawad; C Tournier; Philip Leijssen; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Riccardo Sinigaglia; Albert Bundy; Sandro Costantini; Ugo Nena; Francesco Finocchiaro; Daniele A Fabris Monterumici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.