Literature DB >> 14526193

Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results.

Scott L Blumenthal1, Donna D Ohnmeiss, Richard D Guyer, Stephen H Hochschuler.   

Abstract

For many years, there has been an interest in disc replacements. There are a few retrospective studies from Europe reporting promising results for these devices. The purpose of this study is to review the preliminary results of the SB Charité disc replacement device in a prospective study. The study group consists of a consecutive series of our first 57 patients who received the Link SB Charité device implanted through a mini-open anterior approach. The primary clinical indications for disc replacement were single-level symptomatic disc disease at L4-L5 or L5-S1 and no significant facet joint changes. The outcome data include the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessing pain intensity and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Data were collected prior to surgery and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Twenty-four-month follow-up data are currently being collected. The mean VAS score improved 50.8% by the 6-week follow-up, and significant improvement was maintained throughout follow-up. The mean Oswestry score improved 38.7% at the 6-week follow-up, and further slight improvement was noted during the later follow-up periods. This study found that significant improvements were achieved by the 6-week postoperative visit in the pain and disability scores following disc replacement surgery. Significant improvement was maintained through the 12-month follow-up visit. Although these preliminary results are encouraging, long-term follow-up and a greater number of patients are needed to further evaluate the outcome of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526193     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  7 in total

1.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.

Authors:  C Tournier; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec; J P Lemaire; P Tropiano; V Lafage; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-04-01

5.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  The future of spine surgery: New horizons in the treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Noojan Kazemi; Laura K Crew; Trent L Tredway
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-19

Review 7.  Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karin D van den Eerenbeemt; Raymond W Ostelo; Barend J van Royen; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.