Literature DB >> 15457421

Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component.

Christopher L Peters1, Michael Miller, Jill Erickson, Perry Hall, Kent Samuelson.   

Abstract

Current anti-protrusio cages are non-porous-coated and 1 piece and they require liner cementation. These factors limit bone ingrowth, trials, and modularity. Results of a completely modular porous-coated anti-protrusio component (MAPC) are presented. Sixty-three acetabular revisions with MAPC were performed from 1998-2001 by 2 surgeons. Average follow-up was 29 months (range, 24-50). 30/63 (48%) had Paprosky type 3A or B defects. 55/63 (87%) MAPCs remain in place. Four components were removed for infection, 3 for loosening, and 1 for malposition. Eight hips dislocated, requiring 6 reoperations. Two MAPCs are radiographically loose but asymptomatic. At short-term follow-up, these results are comparable to conventional 1-piece anti-protrusio cages. Advantages include the potential for bone ingrowth and long-term fixation, surgical technique similar to large hemispherical components, ability to trial, and modularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457421     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 2.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

4.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The survivorship of protrusio cages for metastatic disease involving the acetabulum.

Authors:  Mark Clayer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Massive acetabular bone loss: Limits of trabecular metal cages.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Juán Diaz-Mauriño
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Ingrid Bonetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre-Escuredo; Eva Gómez-García; Salvador Álvarez-Villar; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.