Literature DB >> 18813137

Putting it all behind: long-term psychological impact of an inconclusive DNA test result for breast cancer.

Sandra van Dijk1, Wilma Otten, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Christi J van Asperen, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An inconclusive DNA-result for breast cancer may leave women with uncertainty that cannot be relieved. We assessed the influence of beliefs women held about their inconclusive DNA-result on psychological well-being and whether women had been able to put the period of DNA testing behind them.
METHODS: In total, 215 women completed a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire 2.5 till 7 years after DNA test disclosure. Within the group of 147 women who received an inconclusive result (either a personal result or the result of an affected family member) multiple regression analyses were applied to investigate the relevance of women's personal beliefs.
RESULTS: Personal beliefs and ambivalence about an inconclusive DNA-result were associated with cancer-related worry and distress (P < 0.05). Moreover, these beliefs seemed to be an especially strong predictor of whether women had been able to leave the period of DNA testing behind them, even after controlling for all measures of psychological distress (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Psychological distress measures may provide an important but incomplete picture of how women make sense of an inconclusive DNA-result. These findings underscore the importance of discussing counselees' beliefs and expectations openly to enhance well-being and adaptation on the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813137     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318185213e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  7 in total

1.  Is no news good news? Inconclusive genetic test results in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from patients and professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Audrey Ardern-Jones; Regina Kenen; Elly Lynch; Rebecca Doherty; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.857

2.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Lucy V Hanlon; Katherine M Tucker; Andrea F Patenaude; Christina Signorelli; Jordana K McLoone; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Coping Mechanisms, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life Prior to Cancer Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Valentina E Di Mattei; Letizia Carnelli; Martina Bernardi; Rebecca Bienati; Chiara Brombin; Federica Cugnata; Emanuela Rabaiotti; Milvia Zambetti; Lucio Sarno; Massimo Candiani; Oreste Gentilini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-16

7.  Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Henrietta Dijkstra; Ivette Wieffer; Arjen Witkamp; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.537

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.