Literature DB >> 18812965

Vertebral body replacement systems with expandable cages in the treatment of various spinal pathologies: a prospectively followed case series of 60 patients.

Mark P Arts1, Wilco C Peul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vertebral body reconstruction after corpectomy has become a common surgical procedure. The authors describe a prospectively followed case series of patients treated with expandable cages for various indications.
METHODS: Sixty patients underwent single or multilevel corpectomy for degenerative stenosis (13 patients), herniated disc (7 patients), deformity (14 patients), traumatic fracture (3 patients), infection (1 patient), or tumor (22 patients). Six different expandable vertebral body systems were used in the cervical spine (41 patients), thoracic spine (15 patients), and lumbar spine (4 patients). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent single-level corpectomy, 18 patients underwent two-level corpectomy, and 3 patients underwent three-level corpectomy. Anterior reconstruction alone was performed in 30 patients; circumferential reconstruction was performed in 30 patients, 9 of whom underwent reconstruction through a posterior approach only. At the time of the final follow-up examination (mean, 9 mo), the Nurick grade improved significantly. Ninety-five percent of the patients maintained or improved their Frankel score and 67% had good clinical results. The regional angulation was corrected significantly (4.0 +/- 9.0 degrees, P = 0.002), and the segment height increased significantly (3.5 +/- 8.0 mm, P = 0.002). Bony fusion was achieved in 93% of the cases. Subsidence was documented in nearly half of the patients (1.4 +/- 2.0 mm) and was reduced after circumferential fusion (0.9 +/- 1.9 mm, P = 0.08). Eighteen patients (30%) had complications and 12 patients (20%) underwent revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: Expandable vertebral body replacement systems can provide solid anterior column constructs with restoration of height and sagittal alignment. Favorable clinical outcome was shown in most patients, although the complication and reoperation rates are rather high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812965     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325260.00628.DC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization.

Authors:  Christina M Sayama; Meic H Schmidt; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Elder; Sheng-Fu Lo; Thomas A Kosztowski; C Rory Goodwin; Ioan A Lina; John E Locke; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Cervical reconstruction techniques. After adequate selection of the patient report of a series of 34 patients treated with winged expandable cages.

Authors:  Roberto Tarantino; Lorenzo Nigro; Pasquale Donnarumma; Marika Rullo; Antonio Santoro; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

5.  Initial experience with the use of an expandable titanium cage as a vertebral body replacement in patients with tumors of the spinal column: a report of 95 patients.

Authors:  Ashwin Viswanathan; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Egon Doppenberg; Dima Suki; Ziya Gokaslan; Ehud Mendel; Ganesh Rao; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical fixation of pathologic and traumatic spinal fractures using single position surgery technique in lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Alexandra E Thomson; J Alex Thomas; Ivan Ye; Joshua Olexa; Vincent Miseo; Kendall Buraimoh; Daniel L Cavanaugh; Eugene Y Koh; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective analysis of autogenous grafting versus expandable cages.

Authors:  Bilgehan Tosun; Cengiz Erdemir; Omer Yonga; Ozgür Selek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Screw migration and oesophageal perforation after surgery for osteosarcoma of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Luca Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alberto Corrado Di Martino; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Management of severe traumatic flexion-distraction injuries in a multisystem trauma patient: A case report.

Authors:  Jang W Yoon; Kourosh Tavanaiepour; Aaron Tyler; Sassan Keshavarzi
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

10.  Acute lumbar burst fracture treated by minimally invasive lateral corpectomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Thiago Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.