Literature DB >> 9006477

The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.

D C Hadorn1, A C Holmes.   

Abstract

New Zealand restructured its health system in 1992 with the aim of achieving greater levels of assessment and accountability in the publicly funded health sector. A committee was established specifically to advise the minister of health on the kinds, and relative priorities, of health services that should be publicly funded. One of its projects has been to develop standardised sets of criteria to assess the extent of benefit expected from elective surgical procedures. These have been developed with the help of professional advisory groups using a modified Delphi technique to reach consensus. So far the committee has developed criteria for cataract surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, hip and knee replacement, cholecystectomy, and tympanostomy tubes for otitis media with effusion. These criteria incorporate both clinical and social factors. Use of priority criteria to ensure consistency and transparency regarding patients' priority for surgery is required for access to a dedicated NZ$130m (pounds 57m; US$90m) pool of money, created to help eliminate surgical waiting lists and move to booking systems. The criteria will also be used in surgical outcome studies, currently in the planning phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006477      PMCID: PMC2125609          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  67 in total

1.  Real-time priority scoring system must be used for prioritisation on waiting lists.

Authors:  B Davis; S R Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-19

2.  Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade. A successful operation, for which there's a large unmet need.

Authors:  C G Moran; T C Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

3.  Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?

Authors:  D Schopper; A M Torres; J Pereira; C Ammon; N Cuende; M Alonso; A Baylin; A Ronchi; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Ending waiting-list mismanagement: principles and practice.

Authors:  S Lewis; M L Barer; C Sanmartin; S Sheps; S E Shortt; P W McDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Effect of age on visual outcome following cataract extraction.

Authors:  M C Westcott; S J Tuft; D C Minassian
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Setting priorities for waiting lists: defining our terms. Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project.

Authors:  D C Hadorn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  A review of alternative approaches to healthcare resource allocation.

Authors:  S Petrou; J Wolstenholme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Equity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indications.

Authors:  A Bowling; M Bond; D McKee; M McClay; A P Banning; N Dudley; A Elder; A Martin; I Blackman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Nancy Walton; Peter A Singer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' Cataract Surgery Commissioning Guidance: executive summary.

Authors:  A C Day; R Wormald; S Coronini-Cronberg; R Smith
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.