Literature DB >> 18806319

Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.

Paul De Clercq1, Katharina Kaiser, Arie Hasman.   

Abstract

Implementing Computer-Interpretable Guidelines (CIGs) in active computer-based decision support systems promises to improve the acceptance and application of guidelines in daily practice. The model and underlying language are the core characteristics of every CIG approach. However, currently no standard model or language has been accepted by the CIG community. This aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of well-known approaches and to formulate a set of (minimal) requirements that can be used in the process of developing new CIG approaches or improving existing ones. It presents five CIG approaches (the Arden Syntax, GLIF, PROforma, Asbru and EON), followed by a general discussion of the strong points of each approach as well as their implications for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18806319      PMCID: PMC2858861     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  39 in total

1.  A flexible approach to guideline modeling.

Authors:  S W Tu; M A Musen
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Convergence on a standard for representing clinical guidelines: work in health level seven.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders; R Matthew Sailors
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

3.  EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy.

Authors:  M A Musen; S W Tu; A K Das; Y Shahar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine.

Authors:  Dongwen Wang; Mor Peleg; Samson W Tu; Aziz A Boxwala; Omolola Ogunyemi; Qing Zeng; Robert A Greenes; Vimla L Patel; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A framework for a distributed, hybrid, multiple-ontology clinical-guideline library, and automated guideline-support tools.

Authors:  Yuval Shahar; Ohad Young; Erez Shalom; Maya Galperin; Alon Mayaffit; Robert Moskovitch; Alon Hessing
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Incorporation of the Arden Syntax within the reimplementation of a closed-loop decision support system.

Authors:  B McCauley; I Young; I Clark; M Peters
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-12

7.  Using intermediate states to improve the ability of the Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge.

Authors:  E H Sherman; G Hripcsak; J Starren; R A Jenders; P Clayton
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

8.  A C++ framework for developing Medical Logic Modules and an Arden Syntax compiler.

Authors:  R A Kuhn; R S Reider
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 9.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; P Ludemann; T A Pryor; O B Wigertz; P D Clayton
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1994-08

10.  Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care.

Authors:  P D Johnson; S Tu; N Booth; B Sugden; I N Purves
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems.

Authors:  Phil Gooch; Abdul Roudsari
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Toward knowledge-based liver surgery: holistic information processing for surgical decision support.

Authors:  K März; M Hafezi; T Weller; A Saffari; M Nolden; N Fard; A Majlesara; S Zelzer; M Maleshkova; M Volovyk; N Gharabaghi; M Wagner; G Emami; S Engelhardt; A Fetzer; H Kenngott; N Rezai; A Rettinger; R Studer; A Mehrabi; L Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Modeling a Nursing Guideline with Standard Terminology and Unified Modeling Language for a Nursing Decision Support System: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jeeyae Choi; Kay Jansen; Amy Coenen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

4.  Constructing Clinical Decision Support Systems for Adverse Drug Event Prevention: A Knowledge-based Approach.

Authors:  Vassilis Koutkias; Vassilis Kilintzis; George Stalidis; Katerina Lazou; Chrysa Collyda; Emmanuel Chazard; Peter McNair; Regis Beuscart; Nicos Maglaveras
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

5.  Transformation of the National Breast Cancer Guideline Into Data-Driven Clinical Decision Trees.

Authors:  Mathijs P Hendriks; Xander A A M Verbeek; Thijs van Vegchel; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Luc J A Strobbe; Jos W S Merkus; Harmien M Zonderland; Carolien H Smorenburg; Agnes Jager; Sabine S Siesling
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-05

Review 6.  Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.

Authors:  Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: an inventory of tools and techniques.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright; Linas Simonaitis; James D Carpenter; George O Allen; Bradley N Doebbeling; Anwar Mohammad Sirajuddin; Joan S Ash; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Sarah Read-Brown; Daniel C Tu; Dongseok Choi; David S Sanders; Thomas S Hwang; Steven Bailey; Daniel J Karr; Elizabeth Cottle; John C Morrison; David J Wilson; Thomas R Yackel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09

9.  A study of diverse clinical decision support rule authoring environments and requirements for integration.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Neelima Karipineni; Janet Lewis; Saverio M Maviglia; Amanda Fairbanks; Tonya Hongsermeier; Blackford Middleton; Roberto A Rocha
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Implementation of workflow engine technology to deliver basic clinical decision support functionality.

Authors:  Vojtech Huser; Luke V Rasmussen; Ryan Oberg; Justin B Starren
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.