Phil Gooch1, Abdul Roudsari. 1. Centre for Health Informatics, School of Informatics, City University London, London, UK. philip.gooch.1@city.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a need to integrate the various theoretical frameworks and formalisms for modeling clinical guidelines, workflows, and pathways, in order to move beyond providing support for individual clinical decisions and toward the provision of process-oriented, patient-centered, health information systems (HIS). In this review, we analyze the challenges in developing process-oriented HIS that formally model guidelines, workflows, and care pathways. METHODS: A qualitative meta-synthesis was performed on studies published in English between 1995 and 2010 that addressed the modeling process and reported the exposition of a new methodology, model, system implementation, or system architecture. Thematic analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) and data visualisation techniques were used to identify and cluster the underlying implementation 'challenge' themes. RESULTS: One hundred and eight relevant studies were selected for review. Twenty-five underlying 'challenge' themes were identified. These were clustered into 10 distinct groups, from which a conceptual model of the implementation process was developed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found that the development of systems supporting individual clinical decisions is evolving toward the implementation of adaptable care pathways on the semantic web, incorporating formal, clinical, and organizational ontologies, and the use of workflow management systems. These architectures now need to be implemented and evaluated on a wider scale within clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: There is a need to integrate the various theoretical frameworks and formalisms for modeling clinical guidelines, workflows, and pathways, in order to move beyond providing support for individual clinical decisions and toward the provision of process-oriented, patient-centered, health information systems (HIS). In this review, we analyze the challenges in developing process-oriented HIS that formally model guidelines, workflows, and care pathways. METHODS: A qualitative meta-synthesis was performed on studies published in English between 1995 and 2010 that addressed the modeling process and reported the exposition of a new methodology, model, system implementation, or system architecture. Thematic analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) and data visualisation techniques were used to identify and cluster the underlying implementation 'challenge' themes. RESULTS: One hundred and eight relevant studies were selected for review. Twenty-five underlying 'challenge' themes were identified. These were clustered into 10 distinct groups, from which a conceptual model of the implementation process was developed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found that the development of systems supporting individual clinical decisions is evolving toward the implementation of adaptable care pathways on the semantic web, incorporating formal, clinical, and organizational ontologies, and the use of workflow management systems. These architectures now need to be implemented and evaluated on a wider scale within clinical settings.
Authors: Radu Serban; Annette ten Teije; Frank van Harmelen; Mar Marcos; Cristina Polo-Conde Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 5.326
Authors: Giorgio Leonardi; Silvia Panzarasa; Silvana Quaglini; Mario Stefanelli; Wil M P van der Aalst Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Samson W Tu; James R Campbell; Julie Glasgow; Mark A Nyman; Robert McClure; James McClay; Craig Parker; Karen M Hrabak; David Berg; Tony Weida; James G Mansfield; Mark A Musen; Robert M Abarbanel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: C W Shanahan; A Sorensen-Alawad; B L Carney; I Persand; A Cruz; M Botticelli; K Pressman; W G Adams; M Brolin; D P Alford Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Jonathan S Austrian; Frank Volpicelli; Simon Jones; Mitchell A Bernstein; Jane Padikkala; Ashley Bagheri; Saul Blecker Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.342