Literature DB >> 18805927

The Gaussian curvature elastic energy of intermediates in membrane fusion.

David P Siegel1.   

Abstract

The Gaussian curvature elastic energy contribution to the energy of membrane fusion intermediates has usually been neglected because the Gaussian curvature elastic modulus, kappa, was unknown. It is now possible to measure kappa for phospholipids that form bicontinuous inverted cubic (Q(II)) phases. Here, it is shown that one can estimate kappa for lipids that do not form Q(II) phases by studying the phase behavior of lipid mixtures. The method is used to estimate kappa for several lipid compositions in excess water. The values of kappa are used to compute the curvature elastic energies of stalks and catenoidal fusion pores according to recent models. The Gaussian curvature elastic contribution is positive and similar in magnitude to the bending energy contribution: it increases the total curvature energy of all the fusion intermediates by 100 units of k(B)T or more. It is important to note that this contribution makes the predicted intermediate energies compatible with observed lipid phase behavior in excess water. An order-of-magnitude fusion rate equation is used to estimate whether the predicted stalk energies are consistent with the observed rates of stalk-mediated processes in pure lipid systems. The current theory predicts a stalk energy that is slightly too large, by approximately 30 k(B)T, to rationalize the observed rates of stalk-mediated processes in phosphatidylethanolamine or N-monomethylated dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine systems. Despite this discrepancy, the results show that models of fusion intermediate energy are accurate enough to make semiquantitative predictions about how proteins mediate biomembrane fusion. The same rate model shows that for proteins to drive biomembrane fusion at observed rates, they have to perform mediating functions corresponding to a reduction in the energy of a purely lipidic stalk by several tens of k(B)T. By binding particular peptide sequences to the monolayer surface, proteins could lower fusion intermediate energies by altering the elastic constants of the patches of lipid monolayer that form the stalk. Here, it is shown that if peptide binding changes kappa or some other combinations of local elastic constants by only tens of percents, the stalk energy and the energy of catenoidal fusion pores would decrease by tens of k(B)T relative to the pure lipid value. This is comparable to the required mediating effect. The curvature energies of stalks and catenoidal fusion pores have almost the same dependence on monolayer elastic constants as the curvature energies of the rhombohedral and Q(II) phases; respectively. The effects of isolated fusion-relevant peptides on the energies of these intermediates can be determined by studying the effects of the peptides on the stability of rhombohedral and Q(II) phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18805927      PMCID: PMC2586550          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.140152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  88 in total

1.  Peptide mimics of the vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein transmembrane segment drive membrane fusion in vitro.

Authors:  D Langosch; B Brosig; R Pipkorn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Peptide mimics of SNARE transmembrane segments drive membrane fusion depending on their conformational plasticity.

Authors:  D Langosch; J M Crane; B Brosig; A Hellwig; L K Tamm; J Reed
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Evidence for membrane thinning effect as the mechanism for peptide-induced pore formation.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Chen; Ming-Tao Lee; Huey W Huang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  How proteins produce cellular membrane curvature.

Authors:  Joshua Zimmerberg; Michael M Kozlov
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Copper (II) sulfate charring for high sensitivity on-plate fluorescent detection of lipids and sterols: quantitative analyses of the composition of functional secretory vesicles.

Authors:  Matthew A Churchward; David M Brandman; Tatiana Rogasevskaia; Jens R Coorssen
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2008-06-17

6.  Inverse lyotropic phases of lipids and membrane curvature.

Authors:  G C Shearman; O Ces; R H Templer; J M Seddon
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.333

7.  Observation of inverted cubic phase in hydrated dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine membranes.

Authors:  E Shyamsunder; S M Gruner; M W Tate; D C Turner; P T So; C P Tilcock
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-04-05       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  The mechanism of lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal phase transitions in phosphatidylethanolamine: implications for membrane fusion mechanisms.

Authors:  D P Siegel; R M Epand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Lipids of synaptic vesicles: relevance to the mechanism of membrane fusion.

Authors:  J W Deutsch; R B Kelly
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1981-01-20       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The effects of acyl chain length and saturation of diacylglycerols and phosphatidylcholines on membrane monolayer curvature.

Authors:  Joseph A Szule; Nola L Fuller; R Peter Rand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Use of X-ray scattering to aid the design and delivery of membrane-active drugs.

Authors:  G Pabst; D Zweytick; R Prassl; K Lohner
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Function Suggests Nano-Structure: Quantitative Structural Support for SNARE-Mediated Pore Formation.

Authors:  Ilan Hammel; Isaac Meilijson
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Bending free energy from simulation: correspondence of planar and inverse hexagonal lipid phases.

Authors:  Alexander J Sodt; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Membrane structure correlates to function of LLP2 on the cytoplasmic tail of HIV-1 gp41 protein.

Authors:  Alexander L Boscia; Kiyotaka Akabori; Zachary Benamram; Jonathan A Michel; Michael S Jablin; Jonathan D Steckbeck; Ronald C Montelaro; John F Nagle; Stephanie Tristram-Nagle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Hemagglutinin fusion peptide mutants in model membranes: structural properties, membrane physical properties, and PEG-mediated fusion.

Authors:  Md Emdadul Haque; Hirak Chakraborty; Tilen Koklic; Hiroaki Komatsu; Paul H Axelsen; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Achiral symmetry breaking and positive Gaussian modulus lead to scalloped colloidal membranes.

Authors:  Thomas Gibaud; C Nadir Kaplan; Prerna Sharma; Mark J Zakhary; Andrew Ward; Rudolf Oldenbourg; Robert B Meyer; Randall D Kamien; Thomas R Powers; Zvonimir Dogic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Acyl-chain correlation in membrane fusion intermediates: x-ray diffraction from the rhombohedral lipid phase.

Authors:  Britta Weinhausen; Sebastian Aeffner; Tobias Reusch; Tim Salditt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Introductory lecture: basic quantities in model biomembranes.

Authors:  John F Nagle
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.008

9.  Calculating Transition Energy Barriers and Characterizing Activation States for Steps of Fusion.

Authors:  Rolf J Ryham; Thomas S Klotz; Lihan Yao; Fredric S Cohen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Coarse-grain simulations reveal movement of the synaptobrevin C-terminus in response to piconewton forces.

Authors:  Manfred Lindau; Benjamin A Hall; Alan Chetwynd; Oliver Beckstein; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.