Literature DB >> 18805801

Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice.

J Dreesen1, M Drüsedau, H Smeets, C de Die-Smulders, E Coonen, J Dumoulin, M Gielen, J Evers, J Herbergs, J Geraedts.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the overall preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)-PCR procedure and to determine the diagnostic value. Genotyped embryos not selected for embryo transfer (ET) and unsuitable for cryopreservation after PGD were used for confirmatory analysis. The PGD genotyped blastomeres and corresponding embryos were compared, and morphology was scored on Day 4 post fertilization. To establish the validity of the PGD-PCR procedure and the diagnostic value, misdiagnosis rate, false-negative rate and negative predictive value were calculated. Moreover, comparison on the validity was made for the biopsy of one or two blastomeres. For the total embryo group (n = 422), a misdiagnosis rate of 7.1% and a false-negative rate of 3.1% were found. The negative predictive value was 96.1%. Poor morphology Day 4 embryos (Class 1) were over-represented in the embryo group in which the blastomere genotype was not confirmed by the whole embryo genotype. The misdiagnosis rate of Class 1 embryos was 12.5% and the false-negative rate 17.1%. Exclusion of these embryos resulted in a misdiagnosis rate of 6.1%, a false-negative rate of 0.5% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. The two blastomere biopsies revealed a significant higher positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate, whereas the negative predictive value remained the same. In conclusion, the PGD-PCR procedure is a valid diagnostic method to select unaffected embryos for ET. The misdiagnosis and false-negative rates decrease by rejecting Class 1 embryos for ET. The biopsy of a second blastomere improves the positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18805801     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gan052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  8 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease: the experience of three European centres.

Authors:  Maartje C Van Rij; Marjan De Rademaeker; Céline Moutou; Jos C F M Dreesen; Martine De Rycke; Inge Liebaers; Joep P M Geraedts; Christine E M De Die-Smulders; Stéphane Viville
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Authors:  Jos Dreesen; Aspasia Destouni; Georgia Kourlaba; Birte Degn; Wulf Christensen Mette; Filipa Carvalho; Celine Moutou; Sioban Sengupta; Seema Dhanjal; Pamela Renwick; Steven Davies; Emmanouel Kanavakis; Gary Harton; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Mosaicism diminishes the value of pre-implantation embryo biopsies for detecting CRISPR/Cas9 induced mutations in sheep.

Authors:  Marcela Vilarino; Fabian Patrik Suchy; Sheikh Tamir Rashid; Helen Lindsay; Juan Reyes; Bret Roberts McNabb; Talitha van der Meulen; Mark O Huising; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Pablo Juan Ross
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  The impact of parental unaffected allele combination on the diagnostic outcome in the preimplantation genetic testing for myotonic dystrophy type 1 in Japanese ancestry.

Authors:  Hiroshi Senba; Kou Sueoka; Suguru Sato; Nobuhiko Higuchi; Yuki Mizuguchi; Kenji Sato; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  An update of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in gene diseases, chromosomal translocation, and aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yi-Yi Tsai; Chia-Cheng Hung; Mei-Ya Fang; Yi-Ning Su; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  Perinatal follow-up of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis between 1995 and 2014.

Authors:  Malou Heijligers; Aafke van Montfoort; Madelon Meijer-Hoogeveen; Frank Broekmans; Katelijne Bouman; Irene Homminga; Jos Dreesen; Aimee Paulussen; John Engelen; Edith Coonen; Vyne van der Schoot; Marieke van Deursen-Luijten; Nienke Muntjewerff; Andrea Peeters; Ron van Golde; Mark van der Hoeven; Yvonne Arens; Christine de Die-Smulders
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.412

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.