Literature DB >> 18804923

Cost analysis of clinic and office-based treatment of opioid dependence: results with methadone and buprenorphine in clinically stable patients.

Emlyn S Jones1, Brent A Moore, Jody L Sindelar, Patrick G O'Connor, Richard S Schottenfeld, David A Fiellin.   

Abstract

The cost of providing and receiving treatment for opioid dependence can determine its adoption. To compare the cost of clinic-based methadone (MC, n=23), office-based methadone (MO, n=21), and office-based buprenorphine (BO, n=34) we performed an analysis of treatment and patient costs over 6 months of maintenance in patients who had previously been stabilized for at least 1 year. We performed statistical comparisons using ANOVA and chi-square tests and performed a sensitivity analysis varying cost estimates and intensity of clinical contact. The cost of providing 1 month of treatment per patient was $147 (MC), $220 (MO) and $336 (BO) (p<0.001). Mean monthly medication cost was $93 (MC), $86 (MO) and $257 (BO) (p<0.001). The cost to patients was $92 (MC), $63 (MO) and $38 (BO) (p=0.102). Sensitivity analyses, varying cost estimates and clinical contact, result in total monthly costs of $117 to $183 (MC), $149 to $279 (MO), $292 to $499 (BO). Monthly patient costs were $84 to $133 (MC), $55 to $105 (MO) and $34 to $65 (BO). We conclude that providing clinic-based methadone is least expensive. The price of buprenorphine accounts for a major portion of the difference in costs. For patients, office-based treatment may be less expensive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804923      PMCID: PMC2646001          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  36 in total

1.  HIV transmission and the cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance.

Authors:  G S Zaric; P G Barnett; M L Brandeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The cost and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced intervention for people with substance abuse problems at risk for HIV.

Authors:  G A Zarkin; R C Lindrooth; B Demiralp; W Wechsberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Cost-effectiveness of prize-based incentives for stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs.

Authors:  Todd A Olmstead; Jody L Sindelar; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Estimated costs of prescription opioid analgesic abuse in the United States in 2001: a societal perspective.

Authors:  Howard G Birnbaum; Alan G White; Jennifer L Reynolds; Paul E Greenberg; Mingliang Zhang; Sue Vallow; Jeff R Schein; Nathaniel P Katz
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 5.  An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Laura Amato; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci; Marica Ferri; Fabrizio Faggiano; Richard P Mattick
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2005-06

Review 6.  The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance as a health care intervention.

Authors:  P G Barnett
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Cost-benefit analysis of drug treatment services: review of the literature*

Authors:  William S. Cartwright
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2000-03-01

Review 8.  Consensus statement on office-based treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine.

Authors:  David A Fiellin; Herbert Kleber; Jeanne G Trumble-Hejduk; A Thomas McLellan; Thomas R Kosten
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2004-09

Review 9.  Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction. National Consensus Development Panel on Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Christopher M Doran; Marian Shanahan; Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Jason White; James Bell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  26 in total

1.  Buprenorphine versus methadone use in opiate detoxification, are there other factors that should be considered?

Authors:  Hardeep K Bhupal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Application of multivariate probabilistic (Bayesian) networks to substance use disorder risk stratification and cost estimation.

Authors:  Lawrence Weinstein; Todd A Radano; Timothy Jack; Philip Kalina; John S Eberhardt
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-09-16

3.  Factors associated with buprenorphine versus methadone use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Debra Bogen; Gale Richardson; Seo Young Park; Shannon L Dunn; Nancy Day
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

4.  Financing Buprenorphine Treatment in Primary Care: A Microsimulation Model.

Authors:  Jonathan E Fried; Sanjay Basu; Russell S Phillips; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Cost-effectiveness of long-term outpatient buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid dependence in primary care.

Authors:  Bruce R Schackman; Jared A Leff; Daniel Polsky; Brent A Moore; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Effect of incarceration history on outcomes of primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone.

Authors:  Emily A Wang; Brent A Moore; Lynn E Sullivan; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted training in cognitive-behavioral therapy as an adjunct to standard care for addiction.

Authors:  Todd A Olmstead; Cary D Ostrow; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Economic analysis of a multi-site prevention program: assessment of program costs and characterizing site-level variability.

Authors:  Phaedra S Corso; Justin B Ingels; Steven M Kogan; E Michael Foster; Yi-Fu Chen; Gene H Brody
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-10

9.  "This is not who I want to be:" experiences of opioid-dependent youth before, and during, combined buprenorphine and behavioral treatment.

Authors:  Sarah K Moore; Honoria Guarino; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 10.  Narrative review: buprenorphine for opioid-dependent patients in office practice.

Authors:  Lynn E Sullivan; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.