BACKGROUND: Behaviors associated with opioid dependence often involve criminal activity, which can lead to incarceration. The impact of a history of incarceration on outcomes in primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone is not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether having a history of incarceration affects response to primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment. DESIGN: In this post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, we compared demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes among 166 participants receiving primary care office-basedbuprenorphine/naloxonetreatment stratifying on history of incarceration. MAIN RESULTS: Participants with a history of incarceration have similar treatment outcomes with primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone than those without a history of incarceration (consecutive weeks of opioid-negative urine samples, 6.2 vs. 5.9, p = 0.43; treatment retention, 38% vs. 46%, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Prior history of incarceration does not appear to impact primary care office-based treatment of opioid dependence with buprenorphine/naloxone. Community health care providers can be reassured that initiating buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid dependent individuals with a history of incarceration will have similar outcomes as those without this history.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Behaviors associated with opioid dependence often involve criminal activity, which can lead to incarceration. The impact of a history of incarceration on outcomes in primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone is not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether having a history of incarceration affects response to primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment. DESIGN: In this post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, we compared demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes among 166 participants receiving primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment stratifying on history of incarceration. MAIN RESULTS:Participants with a history of incarceration have similar treatment outcomes with primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone than those without a history of incarceration (consecutive weeks of opioid-negative urine samples, 6.2 vs. 5.9, p = 0.43; treatment retention, 38% vs. 46%, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Prior history of incarceration does not appear to impact primary care office-based treatment of opioid dependence with buprenorphine/naloxone. Community health care providers can be reassured that initiating buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid dependent individuals with a history of incarceration will have similar outcomes as those without this history.
Authors: Josiah D Rich; Amy E Boutwell; David C Shield; R Garrett Key; Michelle McKenzie; Jennifer G Clarke; Peter D Friedmann Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: David A Fiellin; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Brent A Moore; Lynn E Sullivan; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen Magura; Joshua D Lee; Jason Hershberger; Herman Joseph; Lisa Marsch; Carol Shropshire; Andrew Rosenblum Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: John S Cacciola; Arthur I Alterman; Kevin G Lynch; Joel M Martin; Megan L Beauchamp; A Thomas McLellan Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-07-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michael S Gordon; Timothy W Kinlock; Robert P Schwartz; Kathryn A Couvillion; Laura J Sudec; Kevin E O'Grady; Frank J Vocci; Hamin Shabazz Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Marcus A Bachhuber; Cole Thompson; Ann Prybylowski; José Benitez; Silvana Mazzella; David Barclay Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 3.984