Literature DB >> 15450648

Consensus statement on office-based treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine.

David A Fiellin1, Herbert Kleber, Jeanne G Trumble-Hejduk, A Thomas McLellan, Thomas R Kosten.   

Abstract

Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) are newly approved for office-based treatment of opioid dependence. Federal and non-federal regulatory and monitoring agencies, national and international researchers, national professional organizations, researchers involved in monitoring, opioid treatment programs and the pharmaceutical industry met to synthesize and disseminate practical information to guide training, practice, monitoring, regulation and evaluation efforts with these medications. We performed a review of the literature, training curricula and practice guidelines and commissioned manuscripts describing recently completed, or still in progress, studies or field experiences with BUP treatment. A consensus process generated fifteen statements: (1) The federal government should collect baseline data on opioid-related deaths and morbidity to assess the effect of BUP on public health, (2) the patient limit for group practices should apply to individual physicians rather than group practices, (3 and 4) telephone and Internet-based physician and pharmacist support is needed, (5) clinicians who provide psychosocial services to opioid dependent patients should be informed of the role of BUP, (6) opioid-dependent patients should be instructed to present for induction in mild withdrawal, (7) the existing Center for Substance Abuse Treatment guidelines provide a reasonable induction protocol, (8) physicians should be prepared to use ancillary medications with BUP induction, (9) a physician or nurse must be available to the patient during the induction period, (10) concurrent counseling and support services are necessary, (11) detoxification without appropriate followup addiction treatment leads to rapid relapse and is not as effective as maintenance, (12) pregnant opioid-dependent women should be treated using good clinical practice including specialist addiction care and prenatal care, (13) BUP induction and withdrawal treatment may benefit from different designations for payment, (14) take-home medication options should be tailored to patients' needs, (15) there is a need for clinical and policy research in unique patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450648     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  39 in total

1.  Influence of site differences between urban and rural American and Central European opioid-dependent pregnant women and neonatal outcome characteristics.

Authors:  Andjela Baewert; Reinhold Jagsch; Bernadette Winklbaur; Gerda Kaiser; Kenneth Thau; Annemarie Unger; Constantin Aschauer; Manfred Weninger; Verena Metz
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Written in response to Scott LD: treating hepatitis C in active injection drug users.

Authors:  Brian R Edlin; Michael R Carden
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Facilitating entry into drug treatment among injection drug users referred from a needle exchange program: Results from a community-based behavioral intervention trial.

Authors:  Steffanie A Strathdee; Erin P Ricketts; Steven Huettner; Lee Cornelius; David Bishai; Jennifer R Havens; Peter Beilenson; Charles Rapp; Jacqueline J Lloyd; Carl A Latkin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Does service diversification enhance organizational survival?: Evidence from the private substance abuse treatment system.

Authors:  Hannah K Knudsen; Paul M Roman; Lori J Ducharme
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  [Anesthesia and analgesia in addicts: basis for establishing a standard operating procedure].

Authors:  J Jage; F Heid
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Behavioral counseling content for optimizing the use of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid dependence in community-based settings: a review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  Michael M Copenhaver; R Douglas Bruce; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.829

7.  Availability of addiction medications in private health plans.

Authors:  Constance M Horgan; Sharon Reif; Dominic Hodgkin; Deborah W Garnick; Elizabeth L Merrick
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-05-17

8.  Factors associated with buprenorphine versus methadone use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Debra Bogen; Gale Richardson; Seo Young Park; Shannon L Dunn; Nancy Day
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  Behavioral and cellular pharmacology characterization of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-(isoquinoline-3'-carboxamido)morphinan (NAQ) as a mu opioid receptor selective ligand.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Amanda Braithwaite; Yunyun Yuan; John M Streicher; Edward J Bilsky
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 10.  The New Kid on the Block--Incorporating Buprenorphine into a Medical Toxicology Practice.

Authors:  Timothy J Wiegand
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.