Literature DB >> 18804767

Muscle function may depend on model selection in forward simulation of normal walking.

Ming Xiao1, Jill S Higginson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify how the predicted muscle function would change in a muscle-driven forward simulation of normal walking when changing the number of degrees of freedom in the model. Muscle function was described by individual muscle contributions to the vertical acceleration of the center of mass (COM). We built a two-dimensional (2D) sagittal plane model and a three-dimensional (3D) model in OpenSim and used both models to reproduce the same normal walking data. Perturbation analysis was applied to deduce muscle function in each model. Muscle excitations and contributions to COM support were compared between the 2D and 3D models. We found that the 2D model was able to reproduce similar joint kinematics and kinetics patterns as the 3D model. Individual muscle excitations were different for most of the hip muscles but ankle and knee muscles were able to attain similar excitations. Total induced vertical COM acceleration by muscles and gravity was the same for both models. However, individual muscle contributions to COM support varied, especially for hip muscles. Although there is currently no standard way to validate muscle function predictions, a 3D model seems to be more appropriate for estimating individual hip muscle function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804767      PMCID: PMC2586943          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

Review 1.  Computer modeling and simulation of human movement. Applications in sport and rehabilitation.

Authors:  R R Neptune
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.784

2.  Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking.

Authors:  R R Neptune; S A Kautz; F E Zajac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Computer modeling and simulation of human movement.

Authors:  M G Pandy
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking.

Authors:  Frank C Anderson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications.

Authors:  Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Muscles that influence knee flexion velocity in double support: implications for stiff-knee gait.

Authors:  Saryn R Goldberg; Frank C Anderson; Marcus G Pandy; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Muscle mechanical work requirements during normal walking: the energetic cost of raising the body's center-of-mass is significant.

Authors:  R R Neptune; F E Zajac; S A Kautz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The impact of adding trunk motion to the interpretation of the role of joint moments during normal walking.

Authors:  Mausam Patel; Mukul Talaty; Sylvia Ounpuu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking. Part I: introduction to concepts, power transfer, dynamics and simulations.

Authors:  Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  The 3D in vivo Achilles' tendon moment arm, quantified during active muscle control and compared across sexes.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Individual muscle contributions to the axial knee joint contact force during normal walking.

Authors:  Kotaro Sasaki; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Whole muscle length-tension relationships are accurately modeled as scaled sarcomeres in rabbit hindlimb muscles.

Authors:  Taylor M Winters; Mitsuhiko Takahashi; Richard L Lieber; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking.

Authors:  Ming Xiao; Jill Higginson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  The interaction of trunk-load and trunk-position adaptations on knee anterior shear and hamstrings muscle forces during landing.

Authors:  Anthony S Kulas; Tibor Hortobágyi; Paul Devita
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Changes in the activation and function of the ankle plantar flexor muscles due to gait retraining in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Trisha M Kesar; Darcy S Reisman; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.