BACKGROUND: Quantification of serum tumor markers plays an important role in determining whether patients treated for cancer require further therapy. Whereas large-scale proteomic efforts aim to identify novel tumor markers to facilitate early detection, optimization of methods for quantifying known tumor markers offers another approach to improving management of malignancies. For example, immunoassays used in clinical practice to measure established tumor markers suffer from potential interference from endogenous immunoglobulins and imperfect concordance across platforms-problems that also plague many other immunoassays. To address these important limitations, this study used peptide immunoaffinity enrichment in concert with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to quantify thyroglobulin, a well-characterized tumor marker. METHODS: We identified 3 peptides in tryptic digests of thyroglobulin that were detected at low concentrations by tandem mass spectrometry, raised polyclonal antibodies to those peptides, and used the antibodies to extract the 3 corresponding peptides from tryptic digests of human serum. We quantified each endogenous peptide using LC-MS/MS and multiple reaction monitoring with external calibrators. RESULTS: The detection limit for endogenous thyroglobulin in serum was 2.6 microg/L (4 pmol/L). Direct comparison with immunoassay revealed good correlation (r(2) = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Immunoaffinity peptide enrichment-tandem mass spectrometry can detect tryptic peptides of thyroglobulin at picomolar concentrations while also digesting the endogenous immunoglobulins that can potentially interfere with traditional immunoassays. Our observations suggest a general analytical strategy for using immunoaffinity isolation together with tandem mass spectrometry to quantify tumor antigens and other low-abundance proteins in human serum.
BACKGROUND: Quantification of serum tumor markers plays an important role in determining whether patients treated for cancer require further therapy. Whereas large-scale proteomic efforts aim to identify novel tumor markers to facilitate early detection, optimization of methods for quantifying known tumor markers offers another approach to improving management of malignancies. For example, immunoassays used in clinical practice to measure established tumor markers suffer from potential interference from endogenous immunoglobulins and imperfect concordance across platforms-problems that also plague many other immunoassays. To address these important limitations, this study used peptide immunoaffinity enrichment in concert with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to quantify thyroglobulin, a well-characterized tumor marker. METHODS: We identified 3 peptides in tryptic digests of thyroglobulin that were detected at low concentrations by tandem mass spectrometry, raised polyclonal antibodies to those peptides, and used the antibodies to extract the 3 corresponding peptides from tryptic digests of human serum. We quantified each endogenous peptide using LC-MS/MS and multiple reaction monitoring with external calibrators. RESULTS: The detection limit for endogenous thyroglobulin in serum was 2.6 microg/L (4 pmol/L). Direct comparison with immunoassay revealed good correlation (r(2) = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Immunoaffinity peptide enrichment-tandem mass spectrometry can detect tryptic peptides of thyroglobulin at picomolar concentrations while also digesting the endogenous immunoglobulins that can potentially interfere with traditional immunoassays. Our observations suggest a general analytical strategy for using immunoaffinity isolation together with tandem mass spectrometry to quantify tumor antigens and other low-abundance proteins in human serum.
Authors: Zubair Baloch; Pierre Carayon; Bernard Conte-Devolx; Laurence M Demers; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Jean-François Henry; Virginia A LiVosli; Patricia Niccoli-Sire; Rhys John; Jean Ruf; Peter P A Smyth; Carole A Spencer; Jan R Stockigt Journal: Thyroid Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Rebekah L Gundry; Qin Fu; Christine A Jelinek; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Robert J Cotter Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2007-01-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: E Consiglio; A M Acquaviva; S Formisano; D Liguoro; A Gallo; T Vittorio; P Santisteban; M De Luca; S Shifrin; H J Yeh Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1987-07-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yuhong Chen; Melissa R Snyder; Yi Zhu; Linda J Tostrud; Linda M Benson; Jerry A Katzmann; H Robert Bergen Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Eric Kuhn; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; D R Mani; Angela M Jackson; Lei Zhao; Matthew E Pope; Derek Smith; Keith D Rivera; N Leigh Anderson; Steven J Skates; Terry W Pearson; Amanda G Paulovich; Steven A Carr Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Sonja Volk; Thomas D Schreiber; David Eisen; Calvin Wiese; Hannes Planatscher; Christopher J Pynn; Dieter Stoll; Markus F Templin; Thomas O Joos; Oliver Pötz Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Bing Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey S Baird; Karin D Rodland; Amanda G Paulovich Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 66.675