Literature DB >> 18801183

Expression profile of CREB knockdown in myeloid leukemia cells.

Matteo Pellegrini1, Jerry C Cheng, Jon Voutila, Dejah Judelson, Julie Taylor, Stanley F Nelson, Kathleen M Sakamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cAMP Response Element Binding Protein, CREB, is a transcription factor that regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival in several model systems, including neuronal and hematopoietic cells. We demonstrated that CREB is overexpressed in acute myeloid and leukemia cells compared to normal hematopoietic stem cells. CREB knockdown inhibits leukemic cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, but does not affect long-term hematopoietic reconstitution.
METHODS: To understand downstream pathways regulating CREB, we performed expression profiling with RNA from the K562 myeloid leukemia cell line transduced with CREB shRNA.
RESULTS: By combining our expression data from CREB knockdown cells with prior ChIP data on CREB binding we were able to identify a list of putative CREB regulated genes. We performed extensive analyses on the top genes in this list as high confidence CREB targets. We found that this list is enriched for genes involved in cancer, and unexpectedly, highly enriched for histone genes. Furthermore, histone genes regulated by CREB were more likely to be specifically expressed in hematopoietic lineages. Decreased expression of specific histone genes was validated in K562, TF-1, and primary AML cells transduced with CREB shRNA.
CONCLUSION: We have identified a high confidence list of CREB targets in K562 cells. These genes allow us to begin to understand the mechanisms by which CREB contributes to acute leukemia. We speculate that regulation of histone genes may play an important role by possibly altering the regulation of DNA replication during the cell cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801183      PMCID: PMC2647550          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Several proto-oncogenes have been demonstrated to be deregulated in human cancer. In particular, the development of the hematologic malignancies such as leukemia, is associated with aberrant expression or function of proto-oncogenes such as c-myc, evi-1, and c-abl. Many translocations with cytogenetic abnormalities that characterize leukemias involve rearrangement of transcription factors, including AML-ETO and Nup98-hox. Some of these leukemia-associated fusion proteins predict prognosis, e.g. t(8,21), t(15,17), and inv(16) are associated with a good prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1]. Approximately 50% of adult patients have been noted to have specific cytogenetic abnormalities. The overall survival of patients with AML is less than 50%. Since half of the patients diagnosed with AML have normal cytogenetic profiles, it is critical to understand the molecular pathways leading to leukemogenesis. We identified that the cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Protein (CREB) was overexpressed in the majority of bone marrow samples from patients with acute leukemia [2,3]. CREB is a leucine zipper transcription factor that is a member of the ATF/CREB family of proteins [4-6]. This transcription factor regulates proliferation, differentiation, and survival in a number of cell types, including neuronal and hematopoietic cells [4,5]. CREB has been shown to be critical in memory and hippocampal development in mice [7,8]. We previously described that CREB is phosphorylated at serine 133 downstream of signaling by the hematopoietic growth factor, Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in myeloid cells [9-11]. We further demonstrated that CREB phosphorylation results from the activation of the Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and pp90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase (pp90RSK) pathways in response to GM-CSF stimulation [9]. To understand the role of CREB in normal and neoplastichematopoiesis we investigated the expression of CREB in primary cells from patients with acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and myeloid leukemia and found that CREB was overexpressed in the majority of leukemia cells from patients with ALL and AML at the protein and mRNA levels [2,3,12]. Furthermore, overexpression of CREB was associated with a worse prognosis. We created CREB transgenic mice that overexpressed CREB in myeloid cells. These mice developed enlarged spleens, high monocyte count, and preleukemia (myeloproliferative disease) after one year. Bone marrow progenitor cells from CREB transgenic mice had increased proliferative capacity and were hypersensitive to growth factors compared to normal hematopoietic stems cells (HSCs). Overexpression of CREB in myeloid leukemia cell lines resulted in increased proliferation, survival, and numbers of cells in S phase [12]. Known target genes of CREB include the cyclins A1 and D [4,5,12,13]. Both of these genes were upregulated in CREB overexpressing cells from mice and human cell lines [4,5]. Thus, CREB is a critical regulator of leukemic proliferation and survival, at least in part, through its downstream target genes. CREB target genes have been published on the website developed by Marc Montminy based on ChIP chip data [14]. Additional CREB target genes were described by Impey et al. [15]. In their studies, serial analysis of chromatin occupancy (SACO) was performed by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with a modification of Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE). Using a SACO library derived from rat PC12 cells, approximately 41,000 genomic signature tags (GSTs) were identified that mapped to unique genomic loci. CREB binding was confirmed for all loci supported by multiple GSTs. Of the 6302 loci identified by multiple GSTs, 40% were within 2 kb of the transcriptional start of an annotated gene, 49% were within 1 kb of a CpG island, and 72% were within 1 kb of a putative cAMP-response element (CRE). A large fraction of the SACO loci delineated bidirectional promoters and novel antisense transcripts [15]. These studies suggest that CREB binds many promoters, but only a fraction of the associated genes are activated in any specific lineage. We therefore set out to measure the functional targets of CREB in a hematopoietic model system. Since CREB is overexpressed in bone marrow cells from patients with acute leukemia compared to normal HSCs, this provides a potential target for leukemia therapy. To this end, we stably transduced myeloid leukemia cells with CREB shRNAlentivirus[16]. CREB knockdown by 80% resulted in decreased proliferation and differentiation of both normal myeloid cells and leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo [16]. However, downregulation of CREB did not affect short-term or long-term engraftment of normal HSCs in bone marrow transplantation assays [16]. To understand the pathways downstream of CREB, we investigated genes that were differentially regulated in CREB shRNA transduced cells. In this paper, we report expression profiling of genes that were differentially regulated in CREB knockdown K562 myeloid leukemia cells and could be potential targets for development of new therapies for acute leukemia.

Methods

Cell lines

The following human leukemia cell lines were transduced with shRNAs: K562 (Iscoves + 10% FCS) and TF-1 (RPMI + 10%FCS + rhGM-CSF. Cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 and split every 3 to 4 days. Primary AML bone marrow samples were processed as previously described [12]. All human samples were obtained with approval from the Institutional Review Board and consents were signed, according to the Helsinki protocol.

shRNA sequence design and constructs

The CREB specific shRNA sequences were selected and validated based on accepted parameters established by Tuschl et al. [17-19]; CREB shRNA-1, CREB shRNA-2, CREB shRNA-3. Controls included empty vector, luciferaseshRNA, and scrambled shRNA. shRNA sequences are: CREB shRNA-1(5'GCAAATGACAGTTCAAGCCC3'), shRNA-2 (5'GTACAGCTGGCTAACAATGG3'), shRNA-3 (5'GAGAGAGGTCCGTCTAATG3'), LuciferaseshRNA (5'GCCATTCTATCCTCTAGAGGA3'), Scramble shRNA (5'GGACGAACCTGCTGAGATAT3'). Short-hairpin sequences were synthesized as oligonucleotides and annealed according to standard protocol. Annealed shRNAs were then subcloned into pSICO-R shRNA vectors from the Jacks laboratory at MIT [20]. The second generation SIN vector HIV-CSCG was used to produce human shRNA vectors [21].

Microarray analysis

Total RNA (10 μg) was extracted from K562 cells transduced with vector alone or CREB shRNA was submitted to the UCLA DNA Microarray Facility. RNA samples were labeled and hybridized by standard protocol to Affymetrix Gene Chip Human Genome U133+ Array Set HG-U133A array. Gene expression values were calculated using the MAS5 software. The expression values are quantile normalized across all arrays. We obtained the expression profiles for a control set and CREB downregulated K562 cells. A t-test is performed between the two groups to identify significantly differentially regulated genes. The analysis was performed using Matlab (Mathworks, Inc.). We find a significant number of differentially expressed genes, which are either direct or indirect targets of CREB. To further characterize the data we have aligned CREB binding data from chromatin immunoprecipitation studies with our expression data. The chromatin immunoprecipitation data was obtained from the website [14]. To identify genes that are most significantly bound by CREB and differentially expressed in our knockdown experiment we first filtered genes by their fold change (greater than 1.5 or less than 0.7). Finally, we ranked genes according to the product of the binding and expression P value (jerry_bind_data.xls) (see Additional file 1). We characterize these genes using three types of analyses: Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis and tissue distribution. For the former analysis, we used the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis tool on the lists of significant downregulated genes. We then identified functions that were overrepresented among these genes. For the second, we used the DAVID website to identify Gene Ontology terms that were enriched in the list. Finally, we compute the tissue distribution of the 200 genes we identified as functional CREB targets. The tissue specific expression profiles of each gene are obtained from HG_U133A/GNF1H and GNF1M Tissue Atlas Datasets.[22]. We first compute the logarithm of the ratio of the expression intensity of each gene in each tissue, divided by its average intensity across all tissues. We then perform hierarchical clustering of both the genes and the tissues.

Quantitative Real-time PCR

K562 transduced with CREBshRNA(5 × 106) were lysed in Trizol and stored at -80°C prior to RNA extraction. RNA extraction was performed according to a standard protocol supplied by the manufacturer (Invitrogen) and pellets were resuspended in RNAse free water. The cDNA was transcribed with a Superscript RT III based-protocol. DNAse treatment was not performed due to the selection of intron-spanning primers. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with the SyberGreen reagent (Bio-Rad) in triplicates and analyzed by the standard curve method standardized to the housekeeping gene beta actin[23,24].

Results and discussion

Since CREB has pleiotropic effects on cell function and potentially activates several genes in hematopoietic and leukemia cells, we performed microarray analysis with total RNA isolated from K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells transduced with CREB or control shRNA. The comparison of transcriptional profiles in wild type and CREB shRNA transduced K562 cells revealed a large number of differentially expressed genes (see Additional file 2). Among these genes, some are direct targets of CREB, while others are indirect targets. To infer which of these genes was potentially directly regulated by CREB, we combined the expression data with the ChIP-chip data of CREB bound promoters as demonstrated by Marc Montminy[14]. As was previously observed CREB binding sites are highly conserved across different tissues. However, these sites are activated by cAMP in a tissues specific manner. Therefore by combining these two datasets we attempted to uncover the functional CREB sites in hematopoietic tissues. Our hypothesis for discovering functional CREB sites in hematopoietic cells is that if a gene is found to be differentially expressed in the CREB shRNA K562 transduced cells, and bound by CREB it is likely to be a direct target. To identify these genes we developed a metric that accounts for both the significance of the expression change and binding data for each gene (described in detail in Methods). Since CREB has been described as both a transcriptional activator (when phosphorylated) and a repressor, we were interested in genes that were both up and downregulated in CREB shRNA transduced cells. The resulting rank ordered list allows us to sort genes by their likelihood of being functional CREB targets in K562 cells. It is difficult to determine, however, where to draw a threshold between the true and false targets. We have decided to restrict our analysis to the top several hundred targets that had both significant changes in expression and binding, as we deemed these to be highly enriched for true versus false targets. However, we do not claim that these are the only functional CREB targets in K562 cells, as the exact number of true targets is difficult to determine. The top down and upregulated genes revealed by this analysis are listed in Tables 1 and 2, and the full list is found in the supplementary materials.
Table 1

Potential CREB target genes.

Gene NameFold ChangeCREB bindingCREB siteGene NameFold ChangeCREB bindingCREB site
DKFZP434G2220.5517253.883395ht hHSPC0560.445481.892546ht h
ABCG20.4790662.244422ht hHSU793030.5735241.812829ht
ALDH20.56041.989872noneILVBL0.6751281.893295ht h
ALDH7A10.620122.051646hKIAA01030.6825282.620283ht h
ALS2CR190.462081.788188htHSU793030.5735241.812829ht
ANC_2H010.6590441.991467ht hILVBL0.6751281.893295ht h
ANG0.6935353.287977htKIAA01030.6825282.620283ht h
APLP20.6366851.219917hKIAA01410.6895363.479426h
APPL0.6682341.391059hKIAA04080.5952713.603389none
ARFD10.5248972.336962htKIAA04940.678385.420821F
BCL2L110.5898943.191337H hKLF50.5535232.062499H
BECN10.6002431.151217H hKNSL80.4686037.854334HT ft
BMX0.3159841.072006noneKPNA50.5626672.859517none
C20orf1330.6358492.420642hLANCL10.6475441.020319none
C6orf670.6106192.665053hLOC516680.5000971.062053ht h
CA20.5922021.082939htLOC517620.5993973.307553ht h
CALB20.6715621.894443hLYPLA30.6640782.379015HT h
CCDC20.5330321.529166noneMAF0.5971942.383458FT
CENPE0.3069863.736367FT htMAPKAPK50.6993562.053184FH
CGI-770.6644354.334985H ht hMDM20.4689912.523732none
CLDN180.5667074.30699ht hMGC154190.6172523.032433h
CNN10.6709571.150221F ht hMPHOSPH10.4237713.535138ht h
CREB10.3827511.816762HT H ht hMSH20.5923023.203985h
CSPG60.5735233.082765hMVD0.6328963.854905ht h
CUL50.6831172.073118H ht hMYL40.699631.010099h
DBP0.679692.805267ft htNEFL0.3434032.413823HT h
DES0.5215161.509794ht hNFKBIL10.6950194.072353ht
DIS30.6925733.837304HT htNIPSNAP10.6791291.215594h
DNCI10.6737212.195167noneNOX30.4554792.60292h
DNMT3A0.6798211.035348hNR4A30.5433615.002146HT H h
DSIPI0.404582.546212HTNUDT50.6730032.561752h
DUSP190.6741952.225933noneNUMB0.6756671.014954HT ht
EIF2S10.6318671.075696H ht hPDE6B0.666962.699363h
EIF2S20.6446613.313634ht hPEX120.6947076.199684h
ESRRBL10.679144.633352FH hPFDN40.5076312.196535none
FBXO220.6887562.206273htPHC10.6721871.053985HT
FECH0.5164461.045191hPKD2L20.5138942.249593h
FECH0.6584711.045191hPLAA0.6038549.235476none
FLJ108530.6229523.981514H htPPP1R20.5687342.04019ft
FLJ108580.6687581.523113nonePRDX30.6152291.847784none
FLJ109040.540261.085341nonePSAT10.475542.492965ht
FLJ110110.6102533.387879ht hPSMAL/GCP0.682211.341117none
FLJ113420.6834822.617474htPTGS20.6844013.057276ht h
FLJ117120.626182.776373htRAB310.6986641.12667ht
FLJ134910.6331253.268155noneRB1CC10.5334751.390318none
FLJ201300.6407872.766588hRFC30.5777876.745001FH ht
FLJ203310.6818598.752576HRHEB0.6822023.47317HT H h
FLJ203330.6905421.946262ht hRNASE40.4361682.975774ht h
FLJ205090.6919491.96435noneSARS20.6921495.455469H h
FLJ232330.4716761.517415noneSBBI260.6833126.75719H
FOXD10.5935225.160553HT htSDP350.5024322.320591h
GCAT0.6567442.122675ht hSERPINI10.315943.277692ht
GCHFR0.6763652.188753ht hSHMT10.6582521.127084ht h
GFI1B0.6711790.999255hSILV0.6628052.130617H
GMPR0.6729751.149663htSLC11A20.6843251.842417none
GOLGA40.5678822.939327ht hSLC22A50.6577461.64513none
GPNMB0.4109921.004344noneSLC27A60.5470391.029816ht
GRHPR0.687062.454475H htSLC2A40.5074662.273185ht h
H2BFS0.5915692.358423htSLC39A80.2011361.004832none
HBE10.6393760.947159hSLC4A70.5320671.262531ht
HDGFRP30.650131.208322noneSMARCA10.5199821.056916HT ht
HDGFRP30.6682111.208322noneSMC2L10.5962882.916083ht h
HEXA0.544672.622927noneSRI0.6718930.826457ht
HIST1H1C0.5903741.983514hSTK160.6807976.555535H h
HIST1H2AD0.669094.768013ht hSULT1C20.5992353.511947f h
HIST1H2AI0.5425182.801688H ht hSURB70.4982451.598812ht
HIST1H2AJ0.6965313.066865ft ht hSYN10.6963753.016534F h
HIST1H2AL0.6020182.600144FHT ht hTAF1A0.5893892.689618none
HIST1H2BB0.5908211.782458ht hTBC1D70.6927551.281463ht
HIST1H2BD0.6748553.111055HT ht hTCTE1L0.3683122.475611ht
HIST1H2BE0.5466212.34815htTFDP20.6706571.016413ht
HIST1H2BF0.5436651.985466htTGDS0.671971.523411none
HIST1H2BH0.6179172.04185noneTHRB0.6705552.256453H ht h
HIST1H2BI0.5858971.443622htTMEM14A0.6560931.175355ht h
HIST1H2BJ0.4938235.335159HT ht hTOM10.640313.221137h
HIST1H2BM0.6874693.533372ft ht hTXN20.6892741.893339H ht h
HIST1H2BO0.6188624.014214ht hUBE2B0.6631943.652863H ht h
HIST1H3B0.5564384.260113ft htVRK10.6505831.000406h
HIST1H3H0.6419462.647758H ht hWASPIP0.5723551.01892none
HIST1H4E0.6082572.458831FT hWDHD10.6248894.984045H ht h
HIST1H4I0.6120882.068983htWWOX0.6718661.882778h
HIST2H2AA0.5609624.032876htZNF1340.6774812.726853ht h
HLA-DRA0.3651413.086303ht hZNF2220.56184.09755ht h
HLXB90.6679261.006593noneZNF2300.4107253.76825ht h
HS2ST10.6944291.032562ht hZNF2350.383712.959812none
HSBP10.6719291.891961ht h

Top down-regulated genes that show significant CREB binding and changes in expression in the CREB knockdown cells. The detailed criteria for selecting these genes are described in the methods section. For each grouping of genes, from left to right, column 1 shows the gene symbols, column 2 the ratio of the expression change in wild type versus knockdown, column 3 the CREB binding ratio and column 4 the presence of CREB binding motifs. The key for column 4 is as follows: F is a full CREB motif (TGACGCTA) that is conserved from human to mouse, while f is not conserved, H is a conserved CREB half motif (TGACG or CGTCA), while h is not conserved, and T is the conserved presence of a TATA motif less than 300 base pairs downstream of the CREB motif, while t is not conserved.

Table 2

Potential CREB target genes.

Gene NameFold ChangeCREB bindingCREB siteGene NameFold ChangeCREB bindingCREB site
ACOX12.1106742.911283H htLDLR1.6785871.525499ht
ADAT11.4102343.769574ht f hLGALS3BP2.1312913.615437none
APEH1.4002612.527266hLIM1.6961771.097432none
APPBP21.4866162.151867H ht hLIM1.8499891.097432none
ARHB2.7584532.77377H htLRRFIP11.9415951.122307h
ATP6V1A1.4468673.016595HT ht hMETAP21.9166322.635425ht
BCL61.6406466.084626HT htMETTL21.5938673.474639none
BDKRB21.6009272.601219noneMGC27311.5885452.80081HT h
BTN3A21.4652643.426679htMGC40541.5027432.777966ht
C20orf121.5118543.12999hMOCS31.7962555.213295none
C20orf1211.4560223.532969HMRPS101.4104711.834794ht f
C20orf1721.4636164.659037H hNCOA31.4952372.715807ht
C20orf231.5283962.622103noneNDRG12.0308962.312257ht h
CD449.5319471.335178ht hNEDF1.5676624.268912ft ht
CDH123.2964411.178959noneNPR2L1.6188646.397355ht h
CDKAL11.7353223.445022noneODZ11.4482792.310975ht
CDKN1A2.2167251.778747H ht hOPA31.4742337.631458FHT ht h
CELSR31.5463753.175919H htOTC1.6930034.881484ht
CENPF1.4150642.654622htPAFAH21.672174.584628none
CHRNB11.550451.412576H hPAFAH21.6310664.584628none
CLECSF21.7475731.251667nonePHC31.422611.747154ht
CML21.479053.427882htPHLDA13.920082.003171h
COL15A12.567921.394566nonePLAT1.6682231.95203none
CREM1.7934973.67068HPLEKHB21.5683954.611748f
CRKL1.6902693.051845H hPPARGC12.2684582.972107HT F ht h
CSMD11.6471161.61907htPPFIBP11.8525262.550633ht h
CTMP1.5487633.386235nonePPP1R101.8709022.447557H h
DBT1.5186044.292329nonePPP1R3B1.6931141.622596h
DCLRE1C1.419923.010944nonePSMAL/GCP1.5065272.707076none
DDOST1.5821012.508459htRAB7L11.6383781.15364ht h
DDX3X1.8170093.42975noneRABL2B1.4860542.496157h
DEGS1.4882211.464348noneRASSF11.4312714.04395none
DIAPH11.4124842.96506noneRBL11.5296522.451247h
DUSP11.5788242.102797FT HT ht hREL1.9448471.143935H h
EGR25.1480232.036633HT ht hRHOBTB31.630572.813465none
EIF51.4225584.208549ht hRIOK31.409512.008376none
ELK11.4051714.088789htRNASE6PL1.5617042.252099ht
ENC11.9571511.549567hRNF321.9543961.603905H ht
F2R1.8047851.098488ht hSAS1.7684937.735178HT ht h
FAM13A11.7808692.014276noneSERPINB92.2446051.418097ht h
FAT2.000511.816506F htSFPQ1.4772653.428149ht
FKBP141.789943.042488htSHARP1.5585161.078188H ht
FLJ107811.4633321.113364ht hSLC31A11.4911043.803168FH ht
FLJ108031.7261962.63943htSLC35E31.7160261.969928ht
FLJ110291.4220013.085667ht hSLC38A21.4977161.914154H ht
FLJ111512.4130551.840398hSLC39A61.4776783.119807h
FLJ205071.7300682.922871H ht hSMA31.4145952.654203ht
FOSL12.2200861.929543HT ht hSMARCF11.5379781.046929none
FRSB1.4236072.982919htSNAP291.5214812.454502h
FXC11.4230195.02095HT H htSON1.424774.933417H
GALNS1.7723312.592543hSPG41.4135333.160161none
GCA1.6901612.92801H hSUFU1.6616932.275704ht h
GTF2H31.59342110.587057HTAP11.4351133.105625H h
GYS11.4186992.559154hTIGD61.7727193.636168h
HBS1L1.4753693.891767htTIMP11.7911551.848154HT h
HIP11.5372142.114631ht hTNFRSF211.4984822.635088ht
HLA-C1.4290023.2916hTP53AP11.5273393.493111ht h
HSPG21.7083611.453039noneTPM42.2014681.33368H ht
ICAM12.204621.198603ht hTRIM261.4000656.12308ht
ID11.5216852.3068FT htTSSC31.8792812.01021H ht h
IDS1.5082861.1848hTTF11.5133823.461645ht h
IER51.668672.847755HT htTUBA31.4814372.500545none
IL10RA1.642462.830231fU2AF1L12.7585423.548509ht
IL10RB1.4100051.192048ht hU5-116KD2.2231482.779884h
IL1R11.8120931.329947htUSP22.354233.920336HT H h
IL61.9802661.460112HT htVPS4B1.4744656.693871H ht
IL6ST1.547023.418269noneYME1L11.4418371.843132F ht h
INPP12.0715081.550135ht hZFP371.5722074.659572ht h
ITGA52.0280081.315131noneZNF1421.509143.028386h
JM41.6068132.392743HT hZNF1551.697464.195939none
KIAA02661.5047962.986155noneZNF1891.6258364.104303ht h
KIF141.4538884.181899noneZNF2211.7771223.569536none
KIF3B1.6231331.560467noneZNF3241.4886014.205703h
LCMT21.5872212.338943H ht h

Top up-regulated genes that show significant CREB binding and changes in expression in the CREB knockdown cells. The detailed criteria for selecting these genes are described in the methods section. The column descriptions are the same as in Table 1.

Potential CREB target genes. Top down-regulated genes that show significant CREB binding and changes in expression in the CREB knockdown cells. The detailed criteria for selecting these genes are described in the methods section. For each grouping of genes, from left to right, column 1 shows the gene symbols, column 2 the ratio of the expression change in wild type versus knockdown, column 3 the CREB binding ratio and column 4 the presence of CREB binding motifs. The key for column 4 is as follows: F is a full CREB motif (TGACGCTA) that is conserved from human to mouse, while f is not conserved, H is a conserved CREB half motif (TGACG or CGTCA), while h is not conserved, and T is the conserved presence of a TATA motif less than 300 base pairs downstream of the CREB motif, while t is not conserved. Potential CREB target genes. Top up-regulated genes that show significant CREB binding and changes in expression in the CREB knockdown cells. The detailed criteria for selecting these genes are described in the methods section. The column descriptions are the same as in Table 1. Genes within the downregulated list were BECLIN 1, UBE2B. Both these genes have a cAMP responsive element binding site(s) in their promoters. These genes were selected for further validation because they are known to be involved in autophagy/apoptosis (BECLIN 1), cell cycle/DNA repair (UBE2B) [25-28]. Quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) with mRNA from AML cell lines (K562 and TF-1) and primary leukemic blasts from a patient with M4-AML was performed. UBE2B expression was significantly reduced in CREB shRNA transduced TF-1 and K562 myeloid leukemia cells compared to controls (Figure 1, p < 0.05). BECLIN and UBE2B were downregulated in primary AML cells transduced with CREB shRNA (Figure 1, p < 0.05).
Figure 1

Expression of potential target genes downstream of CREB in myeloid leukemia cells. Primers specific for the UBE2B, BECLIN1, and CREB genes were generated and utilized for quantitative real-time PCR by SyberGreen method (Bio-Rad Inc.) Relative gene expression normalized to the housekeeping gene actin is shown for the following transduced cells: (A) K562 myeloid leukemia cells, (B) TF-1 myeloid leukemia cells, and (C) Human AML-M4 blasts.

Expression of potential target genes downstream of CREB in myeloid leukemia cells. Primers specific for the UBE2B, BECLIN1, and CREB genes were generated and utilized for quantitative real-time PCR by SyberGreen method (Bio-Rad Inc.) Relative gene expression normalized to the housekeeping gene actin is shown for the following transduced cells: (A) K562 myeloid leukemia cells, (B) TF-1 myeloid leukemia cells, and (C) Human AML-M4 blasts. Having confirmed the validity of our microarray results in these two test cases we set out to characterize the function of the complete list of CREB target genes using two annotation schemes. The first utilizes the annotation contained in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (IPA). This analysis showed that there is a significant enrichment for cell cycle (P < 1e-3) and cancer (P < 1e-3) genes. The full list of genes associated with cancer is shown in Table 3. Many of these genes regulate cell cycle, signaling, DNA repair, or metabolism, which are consistent with previously published results [5,15]. Furthermore, the role of CREB in the pathogenesis of leukemias has also been described in the literature [2,3,12,29].
Table 3

The subset of CREB target genes associated with cancer according to Ingenuity Pathways Analysis.

NameLocationTypeDrugs
Downregulated Cancer Genes
ABCG2Plasma Membranetransporter
ANGExtracellular Spaceenzyme
BCL2L11Cytoplasmother
BECN1Cytoplasmother
BMXCytoplasmkinase
CA2Cytoplasmenzymemethazolamide, hydrochlorothiazide, acetazolamide, trichloromethiazide, dorzolamide, chlorothiazide, dorzolamide/timolol, brinzolamide, chlorthalidone, benzthiazide, sulfacetamide, topiramate
CENPENucleusother
CNN1Cytoplasmother
CREB1Nucleustranscription regulator
CUL5Nucleusion channel
GFI1BNucleustranscription regulator
KLF5Nucleustranscription regulator
MDM2 (includes EG:4193)Nucleustranscription regulator
MPHOSPH1Nucleusenzyme
MSH2Nucleusenzyme
MVDCytoplasmenzyme
NR4A3Nucleusligand-dependent nuclear receptor
NUMBPlasma Membraneother
PPP1R2Cytoplasmphosphatase
PTGS2Cytoplasmenzymeacetaminophen/pentazocine, acetaminophen/clemastine/pseudoephedrine, aspirin/butalbital/caffeine,
RB1CC1Nucleusother
SILVPlasma Membraneenzyme
SMC2Nucleustransporter
SMC3Nucleusother
TFDP2Nucleustranscription regulator
THRBNucleusligand-dependent nuclear receptor3,5-diiodothyropropionic acid, amiodarone, thyroxine, L-triiodothyronine
UBE2BCytoplasmenzyme
VRK1Nucleuskinase
WWOXCytoplasmenzyme
Upregulated cancer Genes
ACOX1Cytoplasmenzyme
ARID1ANucleustranscription regulator
BCL6Nucleustranscription regulator
BDKRB2Plasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptoranatibant, icatibant
CD44Plasma Membraneother
CDKN1ANucleuskinase
COL15A1Extracellular Spaceothercollagenase
CREMNucleustranscription regulator
CRKLCytoplasmkinase
DCLRE1CNucleusenzyme
DEGS1Plasma Membraneenzyme
DIAPH1Cytoplasmother
DUSP1Nucleusphosphatase
EGR2Nucleustranscription regulator
ELK1Nucleustranscription regulator
ENC1Nucleuspeptidase
F2RPlasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptorchrysalin, argatroban, bivalirudin
FOSL1Nucleustranscription regulator
HIP1Cytoplasmother
HSPG2 (includes EG:3339)Plasma Membraneother
ICAM1Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
ID1Nucleustranscription regulator
IL6Extracellular Spacecytokinetocilizumab
IL1R1Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptoranakinra
IL6STPlasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
ITGA5Plasma Membraneother
KIF14Cytoplasmother
METAP2CytoplasmpeptidasePPI-2458
NCOA3Nucleustranscription regulator
NDRG1Nucleuskinase
PHLDA1Cytoplasmother
PLATExtracellular Spacepeptidase
RASSF1Nucleusother
RBL1Nucleusother
RELNucleustranscription regulator
RHOBCytoplasmenzyme
SERPINB9Cytoplasmother
SUFUNucleustranscription regulator
TIMP1Extracellular Spaceother
TNFRSF21Plasma Membraneother
USP2Cytoplasmpeptidase

Column 1 is the gene name, column 2 the localization, column 3 is a description of the protein function and column 4 are compounds that target the protein.

The subset of CREB target genes associated with cancer according to Ingenuity Pathways Analysis. Column 1 is the gene name, column 2 the localization, column 3 is a description of the protein function and column 4 are compounds that target the protein. IPA also allows us to study CREB target genes in the context of protein-protein interactions networks. A network for downregulated genes interacting with CREB is shown in Figure 2, with a subset of the downregulated targets shown in grey, while other genes not in the target list that interact with these, shown in white. Here we see that there is prior literature supporting our analysis that CREB1 regulates PTGS2 (COX2), NR4A3 and TOM1, as depicted by the blue lines. Interestingly, COX2 is an important drug target, and suggests that commonly used COX2 inhibitors may provide a target for acute leukemia.
Figure 2

A network depicting interactions between direct CREB targets (shown in grey) and proteins that these interact with (shown in white). PTGS2, NR4A3 and TOM1 are direct CREB targets whose regulation by CREB was previously described in the literature (clue lines). PTGS2 (COX2) emerges as a central player in this network, and is thus implicated as a potential regulator of leukemias.

A network depicting interactions between direct CREB targets (shown in grey) and proteins that these interact with (shown in white). PTGS2, NR4A3 and TOM1 are direct CREB targets whose regulation by CREB was previously described in the literature (clue lines). PTGS2 (COX2) emerges as a central player in this network, and is thus implicated as a potential regulator of leukemias. The second analysis that we performed used the terms from Gene Ontology to identify common characteristics among the top K562 CREB targets. Here we find the striking and unexpected result that ten percent of the downregulated targets code for histone genes (P < 1e-10, Table 4). We also performed an analysis of the top upregulated genes but did not find any significant GO terms. Although there is some prior literature indicating that CREB or CREB-related pathways may play a role in regulating histone modifications primarily through the histone acetylase CREB Binding Protein (CBP)[5,30,31], the fact that CREB directly regulates the transcription of histone genes in these cells is unexpected.
Table 4

Gene Ontology terms that are enriched among the top CREB targets.

CategoryTermCount%PValue
GOTERM_CC_ALLnucleosome116.88%6.22E-10
GOTERM_CC_ALLchromosome1710.62%2.39E-09
GOTERM_BP_ALLnucleosome assembly116.88%6.60E-09
GOTERM_CC_ALLchromatin138.12%7.56E-09
GOTERM_BP_ALLchromatin assembly116.88%1.66E-08
GOTERM_BP_ALLprotein complex assembly159.38%2.19E-07
GOTERM_BP_ALLchromatin assembly or disassembly116.88%3.84E-07
GOTERM_BP_ALLchromosome organization and biogenesis159.38%5.56E-07
GOTERM_BP_ALLchromosome organization and biogenesis (sensu Eukaryota)148.75%1.63E-06
GOTERM_CC_ALLmembrane-bound organelle7546.88%1.93E-06
GOTERM_CC_ALLintracellular membrane-bound organelle7446.25%4.63E-06
GOTERM_CC_ALLorganelle8351.88%5.39E-06
GOTERM_MF_ALLDNA binding3823.75%6.17E-06
GOTERM_BP_ALLcellular physiological process11873.75%8.86E-06
GOTERM_BP_ALLestablishment and/or maintenance of chromatin architecture127.50%1.02E-05
GOTERM_CC_ALLintracellular organelle8251.25%1.28E-05
GOTERM_BP_ALLDNA packaging127.50%1.38E-05
GOTERM_BP_ALLorganelle organization and biogenesis2213.75%1.59E-05
GOTERM_CC_ALLnucleus5635.00%2.46E-05
GOTERM_BP_ALLDNA metabolism1911.88%2.63E-05

Column 1 is the ontology used (BP is biological process, CC is cellular localization and MF is molecular function), column 2 is the term, column 3 is the number of genes in the target list associated wit the term, column 4 is the percentage of genes in the target list associated with the term and column 5 is the P value for observing this number genes associated with the term.

Gene Ontology terms that are enriched among the top CREB targets. Column 1 is the ontology used (BP is biological process, CC is cellular localization and MF is molecular function), column 2 is the term, column 3 is the number of genes in the target list associated wit the term, column 4 is the percentage of genes in the target list associated with the term and column 5 is the P value for observing this number genes associated with the term. To further validate the hypothesis that CREB is an activator of these 20 histone genes, we utilized previously published analyses of the gene promoters to identify consensus CREB binding sequences. The results shown in Table 1 demonstrate that nearly all the histone genes contain CREB half sites along with a TATA box in the vicinity of these. Thus three lines of evidence support the assignment of these 20 histone genes as CREB targets in K562 cells: expression, binding and sequence based. We examined the distribution of expression of these 20 histone genes across human tissues. The expression data were obtained from the GNF body atlas. We were able to extract expression profiles for 81 histone genes contained in the human genome. Fifteen of these overlapped with the 20 histone CREB targets. We show the expression of all 81 histone genes in Figure 3, where the identity of the 15 CREB target genes is shown in the last row. We see that the 15 genes are clustered into two groups containing more than one gene, with a third group consisting of a single histone HIST1H1C. One of the groups contains histones that are broadly expressed across human tissues, and particularly in all hematopoietic tissues. The second group is instead expressed in a very narrow range of tissues including K562 cells, bone marrow, prostate and thymus.
Figure 3

The tissue specific expression of histone genes. Each row of the figure represents a tissue from the GNF Body Atlas (see methods). We show only the top 30 tissues with highest variance of expression of histone genes. Each column represents a histone gene. We use hierarchical clustering to order the rows and columns according to their similarity. Red indicates that the gene is over expressed relative to its mean expression levels across all tissues, and green that it is under expressed. The histone genes that we identify as direct targets of CREB are shown in red in the last row of the figure. We see that many of these are only expressed in a small subset of rapidly dividing tissues along with K562 cells.

The tissue specific expression of histone genes. Each row of the figure represents a tissue from the GNF Body Atlas (see methods). We show only the top 30 tissues with highest variance of expression of histone genes. Each column represents a histone gene. We use hierarchical clustering to order the rows and columns according to their similarity. Red indicates that the gene is over expressed relative to its mean expression levels across all tissues, and green that it is under expressed. The histone genes that we identify as direct targets of CREB are shown in red in the last row of the figure. We see that many of these are only expressed in a small subset of rapidly dividing tissues along with K562 cells. We examined the expression of three histones that are putative targets of CREB by real time PCR with mRNA from K562, TF-1, and primary cells from patients with AML. The three histones selected were based on our microarray analyses. Our results demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in histonesHIST1H2Bj, HIST1H3B, and HIST2H2AA in K562 and TF-1 cells (Figure 4). Interestingly, in primary cells from a patient with AML, only HIST1H3B and HIST2H2AA, but not HIST1H2BJ expression was decreased with CREB knockdown. These results suggest that histones are differentially expressed in AML and that specific histones are potential targets of CREB. This analysis supports the hypothesis that CREB regulates a subset of histone genes that are normally expressed in a small set of rapidly dividing tissues. These genes are presumably aberrantly activated in K562 and other leukemia cells, and could potentially contribute to the malignant phenotype.
Figure 4

Expression of target histone genes is decreased in CREB knockdown myeloid leukemia cells. Primers specific for HIST1H2BJ, HIST1H3B, and HIST2H2AA were generated and utilized for quantitative real-time PCR by the SYBR Green method (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression normalized to the housekeeping gene actin is shown for the following transduced cells: (A) K562 myeloid leukemia cells, (B) TF-1 myeloid leukemia cells, and (C) primary AML cells.

Expression of target histone genes is decreased in CREB knockdown myeloid leukemia cells. Primers specific for HIST1H2BJ, HIST1H3B, and HIST2H2AA were generated and utilized for quantitative real-time PCR by the SYBR Green method (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression normalized to the housekeeping gene actin is shown for the following transduced cells: (A) K562 myeloid leukemia cells, (B) TF-1 myeloid leukemia cells, and (C) primary AML cells.

Conclusion

We have identified a high confidence list of CREB target genes in K562 myeloid leukemia cells. Several important CREB target genes that function in DNA repair, signaling, oncogenesis, and autophagy were identified. These genes provide potential mechanisms by which CREB contributes to the pathogenesis of acute leukemia. Expression of the genes beclin-1 and ube2b was found to be decreased in myeloid leukemia cell lines and primary AML cells in which CREB was downregulated. In addition, we speculate that CREB may have more global effects on transcription, primarily through the regulation of histone genes thereby altering the regulation of DNA replication during the cell cycle.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MP and SFN analyzed the microarray data, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. JCC, JC, DJ, and JT performed the real-time PCR experiments. KMS supervised the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Additional File 1

Supplementary table 1 Click here for file

Additional File 2

Supplementary table 2 Click here for file
  30 in total

Review 1.  CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals.

Authors:  A J Shaywitz; M E Greenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  RNA interference and small interfering RNAs.

Authors:  T Tuschl
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 3.  Transcriptional regulation by the phosphorylation-dependent factor CREB.

Authors:  B Mayr; M Montminy
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  The role of CREB as a proto-oncogene in hematopoiesis and in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Deepa B Shankar; Jerry C Cheng; Kentaro Kinjo; Noah Federman; Theodore B Moore; Amandip Gill; Nagesh P Rao; Elliot M Landaw; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Rad6 overexpression induces multinucleation, centrosome amplification, abnormal mitosis, aneuploidy, and transformation.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Alex Lyakhovich; Daniel W Visscher; Henry Heng; Noelle Kondrat
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulation results in phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein through activation of pp90RSK.

Authors:  E M Kwon; M A Raines; J Blenis; K M Sakamoto
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Induction of autophagy and inhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1.

Authors:  X H Liang; S Jackson; M Seaman; K Brown; B Kempkes; H Hibshoosh; B Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Expression of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response-element binding protein in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Heather N Crans-Vargas; Elliot M Landaw; Smita Bhatia; George Sandusky; Theodore B Moore; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Potential role of CREB as a prognostic marker in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jerry C Cheng; Samuel Esparza; Salemiz Sandoval; Deepa Shankar; Cecilia Fu; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  CREB is a critical regulator of normal hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Jerry C Cheng; Kentaro Kinjo; Dejah R Judelson; Jenny Chang; Winston S Wu; Ingrid Schmid; Deepa B Shankar; Noriyuki Kasahara; Renata Stripecke; Ravi Bhatia; Elliot M Landaw; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition of Ras-mediated signaling pathways in CML stem cells.

Authors:  Jessika Bertacchini; Neda Ketabchi; Laura Mediani; Silvano Capitani; Sandra Marmiroli; Najmaldin Saki
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Pathway-BasedFeature Selection Algorithm for Cancer Microarray Data.

Authors:  Nirmalya Bandyopadhyay; Tamer Kahveci; Steve Goodison; Y Sun; Sanjay Ranka
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-03

3.  Tobacco Carcinogen-Induced Production of GM-CSF Activates CREB to Promote Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Supriya Srinivasan; Tulasigeri Totiger; Chanjuan Shi; Jason Castellanos; Purushottam Lamichhane; Austin R Dosch; Fanuel Messaggio; Nilesh Kashikar; Kumaraswamy Honnenahally; Yuguang Ban; Nipun B Merchant; Michael VanSaun; Nagaraj S Nagathihalli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  CREB and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Er-Chieh Cho; Bryan Mitton; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2011

5.  cAMP response element-binding protein promotes gliomagenesis by modulating the expression of oncogenic microRNA-23a.

Authors:  Xiaochao Tan; Shan Wang; Liyuan Zhu; Chao Wu; Bin Yin; Jizong Zhao; Jiangang Yuan; Boqin Qiang; Xiaozhong Peng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  CREB in the pathophysiology of cancer: implications for targeting transcription factors for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sakamoto; David A Frank
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  SourceSet: A graphical model approach to identify primary genes in perturbed biological pathways.

Authors:  Elisa Salviato; Vera Djordjilović; Monica Chiogna; Chiara Romualdi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Carcinogenesis and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling: Interaction of the NADPH Oxidase NOX1-5 and Superoxide Dismutase 1-3 Signal Transduction Pathways.

Authors:  Alessia Parascandolo; Mikko O Laukkanen
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  GeSICA: genome segmentation from intra-chromosomal associations.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Yiqian Zhang; Jianxing Feng; Ning Zheng; Junfeng Yin; Yong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets.

Authors:  Zhen Shao; Yijing Zhang; Guo-Cheng Yuan; Stuart H Orkin; David J Waxman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.