Literature DB >> 18797357

Feasibility of Polestar N20, an ultra-low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system in resection control of pituitary macroadenomas: lessons learned from the first 40 cases.

Ruediger Gerlach1, Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont, Thomas Gasser, Gerhard Marquardt, Juergen Reusch, Lioba Imoehl, Volker Seifert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of PoleStar N20 (Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, Louisville, KY), an ultra-low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) system during resection control of pituitary macroadenomas and to compare intraoperative images with postoperative 1.5-T MRI images obtained 3 months after the procedure.
METHODS: Forty patients with a pituitary macroadenoma (mean size, 26.9 +/- 9.1 mm) underwent a surgical procedure to remove the tumor. The iMRI system was implemented in a standardized microsurgical procedure (endonasal, transseptal, transsphenoidal approach) using standard microsurgical instruments. Intraoperative imaging was performed for tumor visualization/navigation and resection control. If an accessible tumor remnant was suspected, surgery was continued for reexploration and, if necessary, continued resection. Total anesthesia time and operation time were compared with a historical cohort of 100 patients who underwent a surgical procedure on pituitary adenomas without iMRI. Sensitivity and specificity of the iMRI to detect residual tumor tissue was assessed in 33 patients (82.5%) after comparison with standard postoperative 1.5-T MRI 3 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: Preoperative tumor visualization with the ultra-low-field iMRI showed a very good congruency with the preoperative 1.5-T MRI scans. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronal scan enabled the surgeon to safely approach the tumor using the integrated navigation system. In seven patients (17.5%), iMRI resection control showed accessible residual tumors leading to further resection. After tumor resection, the final iMRI scan documented adequate decompression of the optic pathway in all patients. Implementation of iMRI led to a significant increase of anesthesia time (246.0 +/- 50.7 versus 163.4 +/- 41.2 min) and operation time (116.9 +/- 43.9 versus 78.2 +/- 33.0 min; P < 0.05, t test). Sensitivity of the iMRI was 88.9, 85.7, 93.3, and 100% for the suprasellar, intrasellar, and right and left parasellar regions, respectively, and the specificity was 90.5% in the suprasellar and 100% in the intra- and parasellar regions on both sides. In four patients, the intraoperative interpretation of iMRI was equivocal; thus, it was difficult to distinguish between very small tumor remnants and perioperative changes.
CONCLUSION: Ultra-low-field 0.15-T iMRI is a safe, helpful, and feasible tool for navigation and tumor resection control in patients with pituitary macroadenomas. Total anesthesia and operation times are prolonged, but iMRI adequately documents the extent of tumor resection. In this series, the PoleStar system increased the rate of resection without disrupting the neurosurgical workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797357     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000312362.63693.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  21 in total

1.  [Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Fifteen years' experience in the neurosurgical hybrid operating suite].

Authors:  M Hlavac; R König; M Halatsch; C R Wirtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas during transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Yong Yao; Renzhi Wang; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Dual-room 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging suite with a movable magnet: implementation and preliminary experience.

Authors:  Xiaolei Chen; Bai-nan Xu; Xianghui Meng; Jun Zhang; Xingguang Yu; Dingbiao Zhou
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Transsphenoidal resection of sellar tumors using high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas J Szerlip; Yi-Chen Zhang; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Marc Goldman; Kara B Colevas; David G Rubin; Eric J Kobylarz; Sasan Karimi; Monica Girotra; Viviane Tabar
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-07

Review 6.  Neurosurgical oncology: advances in operative technologies and adjuncts.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; Benjamin C Kennedy; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  The utility of high-resolution intraoperative MRI in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenomas: early experience in the Advanced Multimodality Image Guided Operating suite.

Authors:  Hasan A Zaidi; Kenneth De Los Reyes; Garni Barkhoudarian; Zachary N Litvack; Wenya Linda Bi; Jordina Rincon-Torroella; Srinivasan Mukundan; Ian F Dunn; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 8.  iMRI During Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Authors:  Prashant Chittiboina
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 9.  Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Cara Marie Rogers; Pamela S Jones; Jeffrey S Weinberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Origins of intraoperative MRI.

Authors:  John M K Mislow; Alexandra J Golby; Peter M Black
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.