Literature DB >> 22833429

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons.

Michael Buchfelder1, Sven-Martin Schlaffer.   

Abstract

Surgery for pituitary adenomas still remains a mainstay in their treatment, despite all advances in sophisticated medical treatments and radiotherapy. Total tumor excision is often attempted, but there are limitations in the intraoperative assessment of the radicalism of tumor resection by the neurosurgeon. Standard postoperative imaging is usually performed with a few months delay from the surgical intervention. The purpose of this report is to review briefly the facilities and kinds of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for all physician and surgeons involved in the management of pituitary adenomas on the basis of current literature. To date, there are several low- and high-field magnetic resonance imaging systems available for intraoperative use and depiction of the extent of tumor removal during surgery. Recovery of vision and the morphological result of surgery can be largely predicted from the intraoperative images. A variety of studies document that depiction of residual tumor allows targeted attack of the remnant and extent the resection. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging offers an immediate feedback to the surgeon and is a perfect quality control for pituitary surgery. It is also used as a basis of datasets for intraoperative navigation which is particularly useful in any kind of anatomical variations and repeat operations in which primary surgery has distorted the normal anatomy. However, setting up the technology is expensive and some systems even require extensive remodeling of the operation theatre. Intraoperative imaging prolongs the operation, but may also depict evolving problems, such as hematomas in the tumor cavity. There are several artifacts in intraoperative MR images possible that must be considered. The procedures are not associated with an increased complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833429     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-012-9752-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  66 in total

1.  A mobile high-field magnetic resonance system for neurosurgery.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; T Kaibara; D Louw; D I Hoult; B Tomanek; J Saunders
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  [High-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging suite with neuronavigation system: implementation and preliminary experience in the pituitary adenoma operation with transsphenoidal approach].

Authors:  Xiang-hui Meng; Bai-nan Xu; Shao-bo Wei; Tao Zhou; Xiao-lei Chen; Xin-guang Yu; Ding-biao Zhou; Huai-yu Tong; Jia-shu Zhang; Yan Zhao; Yuan-Zheng Hou
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2011-08-01

3.  Maximizing the extent of tumor resection during transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenomas: can endoscopy replace intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Philip V Theodosopoulos; James Leach; Robert G Kerr; Lee A Zimmer; Amanda M Denny; Bharat Guthikonda; Sebastien Froelich; John M Tew
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Intraoperative MRI for transphenoidal procedures: short-term outcome for 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Todd W Vitaz; Kofi E Inkabi; Christopher J Carrubba
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Transsphenoidal resection of sellar tumors using high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas J Szerlip; Yi-Chen Zhang; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Marc Goldman; Kara B Colevas; David G Rubin; Eric J Kobylarz; Sasan Karimi; Monica Girotra; Viviane Tabar
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-07

6.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-assisted transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  David Bellut; Martin Hlavica; Christoph Schmid; René L Bernays
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Fluoroscopic frameless stereotaxy for transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  J A Jane; K Thapar; T D Alden; E R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Intraoperative gas cisternography and gas dissection in the operative treatment of pituitary tumors. A methodological description.

Authors:  R Nesbakken; S Reinlie; O P Eldevik
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.745

9.  Frameless stereotaxy as an alternative to fluoroscopy for transsphenoidal surgery: use of the InstaTrak-3000 and a novel headset.

Authors:  David G Walker; Chima Ohaegbulam; Peter McL Black
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  Limited benefit of intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging in craniopharyngioma surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Nimsky; Oliver Ganslandt; Bernd Hofmann; Rudolf Fahlbusch
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  12 in total

1.  The utility of high-resolution intraoperative MRI in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenomas: early experience in the Advanced Multimodality Image Guided Operating suite.

Authors:  Hasan A Zaidi; Kenneth De Los Reyes; Garni Barkhoudarian; Zachary N Litvack; Wenya Linda Bi; Jordina Rincon-Torroella; Srinivasan Mukundan; Ian F Dunn; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  iMRI During Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Authors:  Prashant Chittiboina
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Identification of tumor residuals in pituitary adenoma surgery with intraoperative MRI: do we need gadolinium?

Authors:  Georg Gohla; Benjamin Bender; Marcos Tatagiba; Jürgen Honegger; Ulrike Ernemann; Constantin Roder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  The surgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography for identification of pituitary adenomas using a microscopic transsphenoidal approach.

Authors:  N Sandow; W Klene; U Elbelt; C J Strasburger; P Vajkoczy
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Endosphenoidal coil for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland during transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Prashant Chittiboina; S Lalith Talagala; Hellmut Merkle; Joelle E Sarlls; Blake K Montgomery; Martin G Piazza; Gretchen Scott; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Russell R Lonser; Edward H Oldfield; Alan P Koretsky; John A Butman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Combined high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy increase extent of resection and progression-free survival for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Peter T Sylvester; John A Evans; Gregory J Zipfel; Richard A Chole; Ravindra Uppaluri; Bruce H Haughey; Anne E Getz; Julie Silverstein; Keith M Rich; Albert H Kim; Ralph G Dacey; Michael R Chicoine
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  Impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging on gross total resection, extent of resection, and residual tumor volume in pituitary surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor E Staartjes; Alex Togni-Pogliorini; Vittorio Stumpo; Carlo Serra; Luca Regli
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  Advances in understanding pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Anna Kopczak; Ulrich Renner; Günter Karl Stalla
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.