Literature DB >> 18795308

Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer.

Antonio Pellegrino1, Mauro Signorelli, Robert Fruscio, Annalisa Villa, Alessandro Buda, Pietro Beretta, Annalisa Garbi, Domenico Vitobello.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility and morbidity rates associated with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I endometrial cancer in obese women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Obese patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent total laparoscopic radical surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of San Gerardo Hospital were compared to nonobese patients. The same group of obese patients was compared with patients who underwent radical laparotomic surgery. Obesity was defined as a body mass index more than 30 kg/m(2).
RESULTS: Between September 2003 and September 2007, 75 women underwent TLRH. Median age was 54 years and median body mass index was 28 kg/m(2). Thirty-seven women were obese. There were no differences between nonobese and obese women in operative, time length of parametria and pelvic nodes removed and operative or late complications. Blood loss was significantly higher in obese patients. Comparing retrospectively laparoscopy and laparotomy in obese women treated in our center, laparotomy was associated with decreased operative time, but also with increased blood loss, transfusion rate, duration of hospitalization and frequency of post surgical complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (with pelvic lymphadenectomy) is a safe option in patients with endometrial cancer. Obesity is not a contraindication to perform a TRLH with no differences in surgical parameters between obese and nonobese population. TLRH show a significant decrease of complications compared to laparotomic radical surgery in obese women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18795308     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0790-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

2.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of endometrial carcinoma in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Özgür Bige; Ahmet Demir; Bahadır Saatli; Meral Koyuncuoğlu; Uğur Saygılı
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14

3.  Outcomes of obese versus non-obese subjects undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  W B Davenport; M P Lowe; D H Chamberlin; S A Kamelle; P R Johnson; M Tyndall; T D Tillmanns
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-01-19

4.  Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for obese Korean women with endometrial cancer: long-term results at a single institution.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Baek; Shin-Wha Lee; Jeong-Yeol Park; Daeyeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Risk Factors for Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer Using Traditional and Laparoscopic Methods.

Authors:  Sławomir M Januszek; Barbara Wita-Popow; Marta Kluz; Magdalena Janowska; Rafał Januszek; Andrzej Wróbel; Artur Rogowski; Krzysztof P Malinowski; Tomasz Zuzak; Tomasz Kluz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit.

Authors:  Jonathan Carter
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-12-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.