Literature DB >> 12629234

Tremor response to polarity, voltage, pulsewidth and frequency of thalamic stimulation.

Padraig E O'Suilleabhain1, William Frawley, Cole Giller, Richard B Dewey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thalamic deep brain stimulation ameliorates essential and parkinsonian tremors refractory to medications. Stimulus voltage, polarity configuration, frequency, and pulsewidth can each be adjusted in order to optimize tremor control and maximize battery life. The relative impacts of these programmable variables have not previously been quantified.
METHODS: The thalamus of 11 patients (bilaterally in 2) was studied 4 to 59 months postoperatively. The stimulator was inactivated and medications withheld for 12 hours, and optimal electrode contacts were selected. Stimulation followed at a range of voltages (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 V), pulsewidths (60, 90, or 120 micros), and frequencies (130, 160, or 185 Hz) for both monopolar and bipolar configurations. Seventy-eight combinations of variables were programmed in random sequence. Postural and action tremors were measured with an electromagnetic tracker, tremor was subjectively graded, and side effects were noted.
RESULTS: Voltage was consistently predictive of tremor response. Mean postural tremor amplitude in PD fell from 6.4 cm at 0 V to 2.6, 1.0, 0.3, and 0 cm at 1 through 4 V (bipolar configuration). The voltage response curve for essential tremor was flatter. The monopolar configuration was 10 to 25% more effective than bipolar. The longest pulsewidth tested was up to 30% more effective than the shortest, but frequency changes had little effect on tremor amplitude. Side effects occurred only with monopolar stimulation, and the only setting that was intolerable for the majority was 4 V, 120 micros, and 185 Hz.
CONCLUSION: Bipolar deep brain stimulation at 90 micros, 130 Hz, adjusting the voltage up to 3 V, tends to be effective and well tolerated. Monopolar provides similar benefits for lower voltage, but side effects become common at 3 or 4 V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12629234     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000044156.56643.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  26 in total

1.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes.

Authors:  C B Maks; C R Butson; B L Walter; J L Vitek; C C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction.

Authors:  Alicia L Jensen; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  X L Chen; Y Y Xiong; G L Xu; X F Liu
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-09

Review 6.  Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Tremor varies as a function of the temporal regularity of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Merrill J Birdno; Alexis M Kuncel; Alan D Dorval; Dennis A Turner; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 8.  Treatment of essential tremor: a systematic review of evidence and recommendations from the Italian Movement Disorders Association.

Authors:  Mario Zappia; Alberto Albanese; Elisa Bruno; Carlo Colosimo; Graziella Filippini; Paolo Martinelli; Alessandra Nicoletti; Graziella Quattrocchi; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Alfredo Berardelli; Roberta Allegra; Maria Stella Aniello; Antonio E Elia; Davide Martino; Daniela Murgia; Marina Picillo; Giovanna Squintani
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Myoclonus and tremor response to thalamic deep brain stimulation parameters in a patient with inherited myoclonus-dystonia syndrome.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Dennis A Turner; Laurie J Ozelius; Paul E Greene; Warren M Grill; Mark A Stacy
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  A model predicting optimal parameters for deep brain stimulation in essential tremor.

Authors:  Scott E Cooper; Alexis M Kuncel; Barbara R Wolgamuth; Ali R Rezai; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.