Literature DB >> 18791247

A simple method to account for natural selection when predicting inbreeding depression.

Aurora García-Dorado1.   

Abstract

It has been widely appreciated that natural selection opposes the progress of inbreeding in small populations, thus limiting the actual inbreeding depression for fitness traits. However, no method to account for the consequences of this process has been given so far. I give a simple and intuitive method to predict inbreeding depression, taking into account the increase in selection efficiency against recessive alleles during inbreeding. It is based on the use of a "purged inbreeding coefficient" g(t) that accounts for the reduction of the probability of the deleterious homozygotes caused by the excess d of detrimental effect for deleterious alleles in the homozygous condition over its additive expectation. It is shown that the effect of purging can be important even for relatively small populations. For between-loci variable deleterious effects, accurate predictions can be obtained using the effective homozygous deleterious excess d(e), which can be estimated experimentally and is robust against variation of the ancestral effective population size. The method can be extended to any trait and it is used to predict the evolution of the mean viability or fecundity in a conservation program with equal or random family contributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791247      PMCID: PMC2581957          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.090597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Accumulation of deleterious mutations and equalization of parental contributions in the conservation of genetic resources.

Authors:  J Fernández; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations.

Authors:  E H Boakes; J Wang; W Amos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the mutation-selection-drift balance and for its buildup after size reduction under different management strategies.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Inferring purging from pedigree data.

Authors:  Davorka Gulisija; James F Crow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.821

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The fuel of evolution.

Authors:  C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The action of purifying selection, mutation and drift on fitness epistatic systems.

Authors:  Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Armando Caballero; Aurora García-Dorado; Carlos López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The impact of recent population history on the deleterious mutation load in humans and close evolutionary relatives.

Authors:  Yuval B Simons; Guy Sella
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Dominance of Deleterious Alleles Controls the Response to a Population Bottleneck.

Authors:  Daniel J Balick; Ron Do; Christopher A Cassa; David Reich; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  A Genomic Reference Panel for Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Adam J Reddiex; Scott L Allen; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.