Literature DB >> 18784920

Saccadic inhibition underlies the remote distractor effect.

Antimo Buonocore1, Robert D McIntosh.   

Abstract

The remote distractor effect is a robust finding whereby a saccade to a lateralised visual target is delayed by the simultaneous, or near simultaneous, onset of a distractor in the opposite hemifield. Saccadic inhibition is a more recently discovered phenomenon whereby a transient change to the scene during a visual task induces a depression in saccadic frequency beginning within 70 ms, and maximal around 90-100 ms. We assessed whether saccadic inhibition is responsible for the increase in saccadic latency induced by remote distractors. Participants performed a simple saccadic task in which the delay between target and distractor was varied between 0, 25, 50, 100 and 150 ms. Examination of the distributions of saccadic latencies showed that each distractor produced a discrete dip in saccadic frequency, time-locked to distractor onset, conforming closely to the character of saccadic inhibition. We conclude that saccadic inhibition underlies the remote distractor effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18784920     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1558-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Dave M Stampe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Saccadic inhibition in reading.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Dave M Stampe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of reappearance of fixated and attended stimuli upon saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  D Braun; B G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies.

Authors:  R Walker; R W Kentridge; J M Findlay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Saccade latency and warning signals: effects of auditory and visual stimulus onset and offset.

Authors:  S M Ross; L E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-05

8.  Saccade latency and warning signals: stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events.

Authors:  L E Ross; S M Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-03

9.  Differential effects of non-target stimuli on the occurrence of express saccades in man.

Authors:  H Weber; B Fischer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

  9 in total
  25 in total

1.  Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Antimo Buonocore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Computational modeling of collicular integration of perceptual responses and attention in microsaccades.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

4.  Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  David R Evens; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Disrupting saccadic updating: visual interference prior to the first saccade elicits spatial errors in the secondary saccade in a double-step task.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; David Melcher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Alteration of the microsaccadic velocity-amplitude main sequence relationship after visual transients: implications for models of saccade control.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Chih-Yang Chen; Xiaoguang Tian; Saad Idrees; Thomas A Münch; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Eye Position Error Influence over "Open-Loop" Smooth Pursuit Initiation.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Julianne Skinner; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The temporal and spatial constraints of saccade planning to double-step target displacements.

Authors:  Shane Kelly; Weiwei Zhou; Sonia Bansal; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.